Belfast Interregnum: walls, voids and forward to new ground and porous borders.

Ciaran Mackel
{"title":"Belfast Interregnum: walls, voids and forward to new ground and porous borders.","authors":"Ciaran Mackel","doi":"10.12795/astragalo.2021.i29.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Good cities reward those who walk, looking outwards and upwards, and reflecting on the paths taken and on the sauntering asides that open an easy relationship with the city and its neighbourhoods. The Spanish paseo and the Italian passeggiata are, of course, as much about meeting friends and family as about using the connecting streets and passageways between one part of the city and another, and such act of walking is liberating, enjoyable and important in the making of place. Belfast does not, in many neighbourhoods, have that easy, social connectivity. The once easy cross-city network of minor streets is, in large part, gone. Interface walls, motorways, and other barriers and separation devices are not overtly visible in the commercial city core but continue to define key emblematic neighbourhoods. And the growth of smallscale political tourism manifested in several bus, black-taxi trails and short neighbourhood walks to visit the interface areas and their walls, have potential result, unfortunately, that such walls, as artefacts of conflict, could tend towards permanence. As one of many post-conflict cities, Belfast is still emerging from its historical and localised condition of manifested deepseated sectarianism, where identities and allegiances are linked to a strongly held sense of ownership of territory. Hence, the reluctance to build in void spaces that could help resolve the housing crisis and be model for housingled regeneration and model for developmentpartnering for change with the public, private and community sectors. The once daily reality in the small nurture-field city-of-camouflage and the desire for a more-connected city and neighbourhood does, however, have creative possibility, where conflict, friction, and collaborative opportunity –the collision and kiss of confluence– as creative act, can influence and impact one upon the other, that, as we know, sparks fly: alight. The spirit of self-help and community resilience, the confluence of history, cultural continuity, and an urgent need to act remains an opportunity for transformative change: for the making of new ground in an emerging city-form","PeriodicalId":166592,"journal":{"name":"Astrágalo. Cultura de la Arquitectura y la Ciudad","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrágalo. Cultura de la Arquitectura y la Ciudad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12795/astragalo.2021.i29.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Good cities reward those who walk, looking outwards and upwards, and reflecting on the paths taken and on the sauntering asides that open an easy relationship with the city and its neighbourhoods. The Spanish paseo and the Italian passeggiata are, of course, as much about meeting friends and family as about using the connecting streets and passageways between one part of the city and another, and such act of walking is liberating, enjoyable and important in the making of place. Belfast does not, in many neighbourhoods, have that easy, social connectivity. The once easy cross-city network of minor streets is, in large part, gone. Interface walls, motorways, and other barriers and separation devices are not overtly visible in the commercial city core but continue to define key emblematic neighbourhoods. And the growth of smallscale political tourism manifested in several bus, black-taxi trails and short neighbourhood walks to visit the interface areas and their walls, have potential result, unfortunately, that such walls, as artefacts of conflict, could tend towards permanence. As one of many post-conflict cities, Belfast is still emerging from its historical and localised condition of manifested deepseated sectarianism, where identities and allegiances are linked to a strongly held sense of ownership of territory. Hence, the reluctance to build in void spaces that could help resolve the housing crisis and be model for housingled regeneration and model for developmentpartnering for change with the public, private and community sectors. The once daily reality in the small nurture-field city-of-camouflage and the desire for a more-connected city and neighbourhood does, however, have creative possibility, where conflict, friction, and collaborative opportunity –the collision and kiss of confluence– as creative act, can influence and impact one upon the other, that, as we know, sparks fly: alight. The spirit of self-help and community resilience, the confluence of history, cultural continuity, and an urgent need to act remains an opportunity for transformative change: for the making of new ground in an emerging city-form
贝尔法斯特空白期:墙壁,空洞和新的地面和多孔边界。
好的城市奖励那些走路的人,向外和向上看,反思所走过的道路,在闲逛的一边,打开与城市及其社区的轻松关系。当然,西班牙的paseo和意大利的passeggiata既是为了与朋友和家人见面,也是为了在城市的一个部分和另一个部分之间使用连接的街道和通道,这样的步行行为是解放的,令人愉快的,在创造场所方面很重要。在贝尔法斯特的许多社区,没有这种轻松的社会联系。曾经容易跨越城市的小街道网络在很大程度上消失了。界面墙、高速公路和其他屏障和分隔设备在商业城市核心不明显,但继续定义关键的象征性社区。小规模政治旅游的增长体现在几条公共汽车、黑色出租车路线和短途社区步行中,以参观界面区域和它们的墙壁,不幸的是,这些墙壁作为冲突的人工制品,可能会趋于永久性。作为许多冲突后的城市之一,贝尔法斯特仍在摆脱其根深蒂固的宗派主义的历史和地方状况,在那里,身份和忠诚与强烈的领土所有权意识联系在一起。因此,不愿意在空置的空间里建造,这可能有助于解决住房危机,并成为住房再生和发展的典范,与公共、私营和社区部门合作,共同变革。然而,在这个小小的伪装之城中,曾经的日常现实,以及对一个更紧密联系的城市和社区的渴望,确实具有创造性的可能性,在那里,冲突、摩擦和合作的机会——碰撞和融合的亲吻——作为创造性的行为,可以相互影响和影响,正如我们所知,火花飞扬:点燃。自助精神和社区恢复力、历史的融合、文化的连续性以及采取行动的迫切需要,仍然是变革的机会:在新兴的城市形态中开辟新的土地
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信