Analysing Orders Granted under the PWDVA, 2005

Aparna Chandra
{"title":"Analysing Orders Granted under the PWDVA, 2005","authors":"Aparna Chandra","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780199489954.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter describes the trends and patterns of usage of the PWDVA and examines judicial approaches towards adjudication under the Act. This chapter is based on an empirical analysis of approximately 7,000 Magistrate Court orders from 14 states between 2012 and 2013. The objective behind the analysis is to assess the implementation of the PWDVA in a manner true to its objectives. The analysis includes pattern of usage, profile of users, nature of DV, reliefs sought and granted, reasons for refusal to grant relief such as protection orders, compensation, residence orders, custody of children, maintenance orders. Judicial attitudes and adjudicatory practices indicate that courts tend to locate their maintenance decisions on a male ‘moral duty’ to maintain the wife or mother, rather than on her entitlement to economic support for the services she performs and that the judicial process mostly lacks the multi-agency approach envisaged under the PWDVA.","PeriodicalId":179480,"journal":{"name":"Conflict in the Shared Household","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict in the Shared Household","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199489954.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter describes the trends and patterns of usage of the PWDVA and examines judicial approaches towards adjudication under the Act. This chapter is based on an empirical analysis of approximately 7,000 Magistrate Court orders from 14 states between 2012 and 2013. The objective behind the analysis is to assess the implementation of the PWDVA in a manner true to its objectives. The analysis includes pattern of usage, profile of users, nature of DV, reliefs sought and granted, reasons for refusal to grant relief such as protection orders, compensation, residence orders, custody of children, maintenance orders. Judicial attitudes and adjudicatory practices indicate that courts tend to locate their maintenance decisions on a male ‘moral duty’ to maintain the wife or mother, rather than on her entitlement to economic support for the services she performs and that the judicial process mostly lacks the multi-agency approach envisaged under the PWDVA.
分析2005年根据《工务条例》发出的命令
本章描述了PWDVA的使用趋势和模式,并审查了根据该法进行裁决的司法途径。本章基于对2012年至2013年间来自14个州的约7000份地方法院命令的实证分析。分析的目的是评估《工务楼宇价值评估法》的实施情况,以符合其目标。分析包括使用模式、用户概况、家庭暴力的性质、寻求和给予的救济、拒绝给予救济的理由,如保护令、赔偿、居住令、子女监护权、赡养令。司法态度和司法实践表明,法院倾向于根据男性赡养妻子或母亲的“道德责任”作出赡养决定,而不是根据她所提供的服务获得经济支持的权利,而且司法程序大多缺乏《残疾人权利法》所设想的多机构办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信