Prigimtinės ir pozityvistinės teisės doktrinų sąveikos problematiškumas

Mindaugas Verbickas
{"title":"Prigimtinės ir pozityvistinės teisės doktrinų sąveikos problematiškumas","authors":"Mindaugas Verbickas","doi":"10.7220/2335-8785.61(89).5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological changes in modern society draw up presumptions for the discussion: whether to follow classical principles of Natural law or create new ones based on Utilitarian arguments and human rights? Dominative Posi­tivistic law and its discourse purposive independence from the facts keep open questions about the legal objectives and purpose. However, these answers can be found in the principles of Natural law. This article analyses the clas­sical meaning of Natural law as well as stages of its formation, the background of Positivistic Law appearance and possible interaction between these two Law doctrines.","PeriodicalId":124689,"journal":{"name":"SOTER: Journal of Religious Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOTER: Journal of Religious Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7220/2335-8785.61(89).5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological changes in modern society draw up presumptions for the discussion: whether to follow classical principles of Natural law or create new ones based on Utilitarian arguments and human rights? Dominative Posi­tivistic law and its discourse purposive independence from the facts keep open questions about the legal objectives and purpose. However, these answers can be found in the principles of Natural law. This article analyses the clas­sical meaning of Natural law as well as stages of its formation, the background of Positivistic Law appearance and possible interaction between these two Law doctrines.
现代社会的技术变革为讨论提出了假设:是遵循自然法的经典原则,还是基于功利主义的论点和人权创造新的原则?主导性实证主义法律及其话语的目的性独立于事实,使法律的目的和目的成为悬而未决的问题。然而,这些答案可以在自然法的原则中找到。本文分析了自然法的古典意义及其形成阶段,实证法学产生的背景,以及实证法学与实证法学之间可能的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信