A Global Pandemic: How Different Nations Coped with COVID-19 Phobia

S. Lindinger-Sternart, Y. Widyaningsih, Kaur, Patel Ak
{"title":"A Global Pandemic: How Different Nations Coped with COVID-19 Phobia","authors":"S. Lindinger-Sternart, Y. Widyaningsih, Kaur, Patel Ak","doi":"10.26420/jpsychiatrymentaldisord.2021.1041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study examined the impact of coping on COVID-19 Phobia (C19P) among individuals from different nations including a cluster of European countries, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, and the United States of America (USA) by using quantitative measures (C19P-S; Brief COPE) and a demographic questionnaire. Method: The research participants were recruited via disseminating an electronic survey on Facebook Messenger. We used the sample of 812 participants from our previous study that focused on resilience toward C19P. Result: Most coping styles correlated statistically significantly with the level of C19P at different domains including psychological, psychosomatic, economic, and social factors. At least two nations out of the five had statistically different scores for all 14 coping styles (p <0.05). The coping styles including selfdistraction, use of emotional support, use of instrumental support, behavioral disengagement, humor, religion, and self-blame were statistically significantly affected by age (p <0.05).","PeriodicalId":388603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry & Mental Disorders","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatry & Mental Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/jpsychiatrymentaldisord.2021.1041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: This study examined the impact of coping on COVID-19 Phobia (C19P) among individuals from different nations including a cluster of European countries, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, and the United States of America (USA) by using quantitative measures (C19P-S; Brief COPE) and a demographic questionnaire. Method: The research participants were recruited via disseminating an electronic survey on Facebook Messenger. We used the sample of 812 participants from our previous study that focused on resilience toward C19P. Result: Most coping styles correlated statistically significantly with the level of C19P at different domains including psychological, psychosomatic, economic, and social factors. At least two nations out of the five had statistically different scores for all 14 coping styles (p <0.05). The coping styles including selfdistraction, use of emotional support, use of instrumental support, behavioral disengagement, humor, religion, and self-blame were statistically significantly affected by age (p <0.05).
全球大流行:不同国家如何应对COVID-19恐惧症
目的:本研究采用定量测量法(C19P- s;(简称COPE)和人口调查问卷。方法:通过在Facebook Messenger上发布电子调查来招募研究参与者。我们使用了之前研究中812名参与者的样本,该研究关注的是对C19P的弹性。结果:多数应对方式与心理、心身、经济、社会等各领域C19P水平均有显著相关。五个国家中至少有两个国家在所有14种应对方式上的得分有统计学差异(p <0.05)。自我分心、使用情感支持、使用工具支持、行为脱离、幽默、宗教、自责等应对方式受年龄的影响有统计学意义(p <0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信