Constantly Connected: What are the Biggest Challenges to Communication?

C. Biddulph
{"title":"Constantly Connected: What are the Biggest Challenges to Communication?","authors":"C. Biddulph","doi":"10.5920/FIELDS.575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media (SM) are websites and applications which allow individuals to engage in social networking (Stevenson, 2010). This allows for friends and family to stay connected (Gemmill & Peterson, 2006), thus changing the dynamics of communication between people. However, little has been documented on the effect SM use has had on face-to-face communication. \nSix semi-structured interviews were conducted with university students to explore how the use of SM has changed face-to-face communication. Additionally, whether the Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) impacted on social interaction, and how university students’ understanding of this phenomenon was also explored. \nFindings from this study show that SM use has varying effects on face-to-face communication ranging from an effect on the relationship between individuals in the conversation, to an effect in the context of a social situation. This led to identification of a social etiquette for using SM in face-to-face communication. Links to social constructionist theory, as well as FoMO, were also identified in this research. Further research into the effect of FoMO on face-to-face communication and how SM use influences face-to-face communication skills would be beneficial.","PeriodicalId":239976,"journal":{"name":"Fields: journal of Huddersfield student research","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fields: journal of Huddersfield student research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5920/FIELDS.575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media (SM) are websites and applications which allow individuals to engage in social networking (Stevenson, 2010). This allows for friends and family to stay connected (Gemmill & Peterson, 2006), thus changing the dynamics of communication between people. However, little has been documented on the effect SM use has had on face-to-face communication. Six semi-structured interviews were conducted with university students to explore how the use of SM has changed face-to-face communication. Additionally, whether the Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) impacted on social interaction, and how university students’ understanding of this phenomenon was also explored. Findings from this study show that SM use has varying effects on face-to-face communication ranging from an effect on the relationship between individuals in the conversation, to an effect in the context of a social situation. This led to identification of a social etiquette for using SM in face-to-face communication. Links to social constructionist theory, as well as FoMO, were also identified in this research. Further research into the effect of FoMO on face-to-face communication and how SM use influences face-to-face communication skills would be beneficial.
持续联系:沟通的最大挑战是什么?
社交媒体(SM)是允许个人参与社交网络的网站和应用程序(Stevenson, 2010)。这使得朋友和家人保持联系(Gemmill & Peterson, 2006),从而改变了人们之间的交流动态。然而,关于使用SM对面对面交流的影响的文献很少。我们对大学生进行了六次半结构化访谈,以探讨SM的使用如何改变了面对面的交流。此外,本研究还探讨了错失恐惧症(Fear of Missing Out, FoMO)是否会影响社会交往,以及大学生对这一现象的理解。这项研究的结果表明,使用短信对面对面交流有不同的影响,从对谈话中的个人关系的影响到对社交情境的影响。这导致了在面对面交流中使用SM的社交礼仪的识别。该研究还发现了与社会建构主义理论以及FoMO的联系。进一步研究FoMO对面对面交流的影响以及SM的使用如何影响面对面交流技巧将是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信