Conclusion

Taylor N. Carlson, Marisa A. Abrajano, L. G. Bedolla
{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"Taylor N. Carlson, Marisa A. Abrajano, L. G. Bedolla","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190082116.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this concluding chapter, we summarize our core findings and connect them to our broader argument. We discuss some of the limitations of this book with an eye toward future research. Our analyses reveal the wide-ranging potential explanatory power of political discussion networks for U.S. political behavior. At a minimum, our results show how focusing solely on the individual level as the main driver of political actions misses the important ways in which individuals interact with their social context. Such interactions have the potential to explain more fully patterns of political behavior and how that interaction is mediated by individuals’ experiences of marginalization and privilege.","PeriodicalId":359372,"journal":{"name":"Talking Politics","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talking Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190082116.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this concluding chapter, we summarize our core findings and connect them to our broader argument. We discuss some of the limitations of this book with an eye toward future research. Our analyses reveal the wide-ranging potential explanatory power of political discussion networks for U.S. political behavior. At a minimum, our results show how focusing solely on the individual level as the main driver of political actions misses the important ways in which individuals interact with their social context. Such interactions have the potential to explain more fully patterns of political behavior and how that interaction is mediated by individuals’ experiences of marginalization and privilege.
结论
在这最后一章中,我们总结了我们的核心发现,并将它们与我们更广泛的论点联系起来。我们讨论了本书的一些局限性,着眼于未来的研究。我们的分析揭示了政治讨论网络对美国政治行为的广泛潜在解释力。至少,我们的研究结果表明,仅仅关注个人层面作为政治行动的主要驱动力,忽略了个人与社会环境互动的重要方式。这种相互作用有可能更全面地解释政治行为模式,以及这种相互作用是如何被个人的边缘化和特权经历所调节的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信