KONSEKUENSI HUKUM TERHADAP VAKSINASI DALAM PERPEKTIF HAM

R. Luhukay
{"title":"KONSEKUENSI HUKUM TERHADAP VAKSINASI DALAM PERPEKTIF HAM","authors":"R. Luhukay","doi":"10.25139/lex.v5i2.4580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increase in Covid patients in Indonesia has made the Indonesian government work quickly in increasing the community's immunity by vaccinating as a form of government responsibility in providing health insurance. The government's responsibility is not only limited to giving gifts, but the government is responsible for post-work follow-up events (KIPI), namely medical events suspected of involving works of art. The government remains responsible for patients who experience health problems. In the implementation in Jakarta, there are considerations between regulations that require vaccines with punitive consequences and human rights arrangements that guarantee the right to health, which is a personal right. by giving individuals the right to determine health services for themselves. For this reason, it is a right that comes from an idea in constitutionalism to limit the power of power in such a way, so that the exercise of power is not arbitrary and thus it is hoped that the rights of citizens will be more protected, because that right has arisen before the constitution was created. alone. \nKeywords: Information, Law, Vaccination, Human Rights.","PeriodicalId":166391,"journal":{"name":"Lex Journal : Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Journal : Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v5i2.4580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increase in Covid patients in Indonesia has made the Indonesian government work quickly in increasing the community's immunity by vaccinating as a form of government responsibility in providing health insurance. The government's responsibility is not only limited to giving gifts, but the government is responsible for post-work follow-up events (KIPI), namely medical events suspected of involving works of art. The government remains responsible for patients who experience health problems. In the implementation in Jakarta, there are considerations between regulations that require vaccines with punitive consequences and human rights arrangements that guarantee the right to health, which is a personal right. by giving individuals the right to determine health services for themselves. For this reason, it is a right that comes from an idea in constitutionalism to limit the power of power in such a way, so that the exercise of power is not arbitrary and thus it is hoped that the rights of citizens will be more protected, because that right has arisen before the constitution was created. alone. Keywords: Information, Law, Vaccination, Human Rights.
在人权范围内接种疫苗的法律后果
印度尼西亚新冠肺炎患者的增加促使印度尼西亚政府迅速开展工作,通过将接种疫苗作为政府提供健康保险的一种责任形式,提高社区免疫力。政府的责任不仅限于赠送礼品,政府还对事后跟进事件(KIPI)负责,即涉嫌涉及艺术品的医疗事件。政府仍然对出现健康问题的病人负责。在雅加达的实施过程中,需要在要求接种具有惩罚性后果的疫苗的条例与保障健康权的人权安排之间进行考虑,健康权是一项个人权利。赋予个人自行决定卫生服务的权利。因此,它是一种来自宪政思想的权利,以这种方式限制权力的权力,使权力的行使不是任意的,从而希望公民的权利得到更多的保护,因为这种权利在宪法创建之前就已经出现了。一个人。关键词:信息,法律,疫苗接种,人权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信