Rethinking Decimalization: The Impact of Increased Tick Sizes on Trading Activity, Volatility, and Price Clustering

Benjamin M. Blau, Ryan J. Whitby
{"title":"Rethinking Decimalization: The Impact of Increased Tick Sizes on Trading Activity, Volatility, and Price Clustering","authors":"Benjamin M. Blau, Ryan J. Whitby","doi":"10.1142/s2382626620500069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we examine the trading activity and volatility of stocks influenced by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s pilot program that increases tick sizes for various samples of stocks. The objective of the program is to improve the market quality of small-cap stocks, which have historically been relatively less liquid than other stocks. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we find that, relative to control stocks, the trading activity of pilot stocks does not appear to be meaningfully affected by the increase in tick sizes. Volatility, however, increases markedly for the pilot stocks compared to non-pilot stocks. These results are robust to the three different sets of pilot stocks, various rollout periods, and different control groups. We also find that pilot stocks tend to cluster on round increments of $0.05 more frequently than non-pilot stocks after the rollout periods. This is true particularly for pilot stocks that quote on $0.05 but trade on $0.01. To the extent that prices convey important information to market participants, these latter results suggest that the discreteness in prices imposed by the pilot program may adversely affect the informativeness of prices in equity markets.","PeriodicalId":232544,"journal":{"name":"Market Microstructure and Liquidity","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Market Microstructure and Liquidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2382626620500069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we examine the trading activity and volatility of stocks influenced by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s pilot program that increases tick sizes for various samples of stocks. The objective of the program is to improve the market quality of small-cap stocks, which have historically been relatively less liquid than other stocks. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we find that, relative to control stocks, the trading activity of pilot stocks does not appear to be meaningfully affected by the increase in tick sizes. Volatility, however, increases markedly for the pilot stocks compared to non-pilot stocks. These results are robust to the three different sets of pilot stocks, various rollout periods, and different control groups. We also find that pilot stocks tend to cluster on round increments of $0.05 more frequently than non-pilot stocks after the rollout periods. This is true particularly for pilot stocks that quote on $0.05 but trade on $0.01. To the extent that prices convey important information to market participants, these latter results suggest that the discreteness in prices imposed by the pilot program may adversely affect the informativeness of prices in equity markets.
重新思考十进制:增加刻度大小对交易活动、波动性和价格聚类的影响
在本研究中,我们研究了美国证券交易委员会的试点计划对股票的交易活动和波动性的影响,该计划增加了各种股票样本的滴答大小。该计划的目标是改善小盘股的市场质量,这些股票历来比其他股票流动性相对较差。使用差异中的差异方法,我们发现,相对于控制股票,试点股票的交易活动似乎不受tick大小增加的有意义的影响。然而,与非试点股票相比,试点股票的波动性明显增加。这些结果对于三组不同的试点库存、不同的推出周期和不同的对照组都是稳健的。我们还发现,试点股票在推出期后比非试点股票更倾向于聚集在0.05美元的轮增量上。对于报价为0.05美元但交易价格为0.01美元的试点股票来说尤其如此。就价格向市场参与者传达重要信息的程度而言,后一项结果表明,试点计划所施加的价格离散性可能会对股票市场价格的信息性产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信