Court as a Symbolic Resource

M. Mohsin Alam Bhat
{"title":"Court as a Symbolic Resource","authors":"M. Mohsin Alam Bhat","doi":"10.1017/9781108565530.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyzes the impact of the Indian Supreme Court's watershed case on quotas for \"backward classes,\" the Indra Sawhneycase. It explores the role of the decision in the mobilization of Dalit Muslims, who have been excluded from the constitutionally mandated affirmative action regime for the erstwhile Untouchable or Dalit castes (\"Scheduled Castes\"). It shows how the incipient mobilization came to creatively interpret the decision, in particular its interpretation of Hindu caste and a partial recognition of Muslim social stratification, as an endorsement of their claims. The appropriation and activation of the judgment allowed the mobilization to generate further political support, convince state commissions and eventually mount a constitutional challenge in the Court. This account aims to highlight the symbolic potential of the Court's decisions, often through unintended mechanisms, to reshape and extend social movement politics. It also highlights the role of political constraints, organizational infrastructure and the Indian institutional context as relevant factors in assessing judicial impact.","PeriodicalId":310920,"journal":{"name":"A Qualified Hope","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Qualified Hope","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108565530.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the impact of the Indian Supreme Court's watershed case on quotas for "backward classes," the Indra Sawhneycase. It explores the role of the decision in the mobilization of Dalit Muslims, who have been excluded from the constitutionally mandated affirmative action regime for the erstwhile Untouchable or Dalit castes ("Scheduled Castes"). It shows how the incipient mobilization came to creatively interpret the decision, in particular its interpretation of Hindu caste and a partial recognition of Muslim social stratification, as an endorsement of their claims. The appropriation and activation of the judgment allowed the mobilization to generate further political support, convince state commissions and eventually mount a constitutional challenge in the Court. This account aims to highlight the symbolic potential of the Court's decisions, often through unintended mechanisms, to reshape and extend social movement politics. It also highlights the role of political constraints, organizational infrastructure and the Indian institutional context as relevant factors in assessing judicial impact.
法院作为一种象征资源
本章分析了印度最高法院的分水岭案对“落后阶级”配额的影响,即因德拉·索尼案。它探讨了该决定在动员达利特穆斯林中的作用,达利特穆斯林被排除在宪法规定的针对以前的贱民或达利特种姓(“排期种姓”)的平权行动制度之外。它显示了最初的动员是如何创造性地解释这一决定的,特别是它对印度教种姓和部分承认穆斯林社会分层的解释,作为对他们主张的认可。判决书的拨款和生效使动员能够获得进一步的政治支持,说服各州委员会,并最终在法院提出宪法挑战。这篇文章旨在强调最高法院裁决的象征潜力,通常是通过意想不到的机制来重塑和扩展社会运动政治。它还强调了政治限制、组织基础设施和印度体制背景作为评估司法影响的相关因素的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书