Assessing Public Priorities for Experiment Station Research: Contingent Value and Public Preferences for Agricultural Research

S. Swallow, M. Mazzotta
{"title":"Assessing Public Priorities for Experiment Station Research: Contingent Value and Public Preferences for Agricultural Research","authors":"S. Swallow, M. Mazzotta","doi":"10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00647.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laws concerning government accountability mandate that agencies weigh constituent interests in setting priorities. This study extends literature on the value of research by considering the public's stated preferences for scientist-effort allocated across an Agricultural Experiment Station's research portfolio. Over 75% of respondents expressed a willingness-to-pay exceeding $20 per household for allocations of at least 139 scientist-months. The mean household is willing to pay about $25 for a 25% increase in effort. Marginal analysis identifies topic areas where an additional scientist-month provides above- or below-average benefits. The distribution of effort across research topics significantly affects respondents' values.","PeriodicalId":375525,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: American Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: American Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00647.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Laws concerning government accountability mandate that agencies weigh constituent interests in setting priorities. This study extends literature on the value of research by considering the public's stated preferences for scientist-effort allocated across an Agricultural Experiment Station's research portfolio. Over 75% of respondents expressed a willingness-to-pay exceeding $20 per household for allocations of at least 139 scientist-months. The mean household is willing to pay about $25 for a 25% increase in effort. Marginal analysis identifies topic areas where an additional scientist-month provides above- or below-average benefits. The distribution of effort across research topics significantly affects respondents' values.
评估实验站研究的公共优先权:农业研究的偶然价值和公众偏好
有关政府问责的法律规定,各机构在确定优先事项时应权衡各组成部分的利益。本研究通过考虑公众对农业实验站研究组合中分配的科学家努力的陈述偏好,扩展了关于研究价值的文献。超过75%的受访者表示愿意为每户至少139个科学家月的分配支付超过20美元的费用。平均每个家庭愿意为增加25%的工作量支付25美元。边际分析确定了一个额外的科学家月提供高于或低于平均水平的收益的主题领域。跨研究课题的努力分配显著影响受访者的价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信