An Orchestra Faces the Test of Indeterminacy

C. Canonne, A. Robert
{"title":"An Orchestra Faces the Test of Indeterminacy","authors":"C. Canonne, A. Robert","doi":"10.4000/bssg.643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the collaboration between ONCEIM—an orchestra made up of about thirty musicians specialised in musical improvisation —and the pianist and improviser John Tilbury, from whom ONCEIM commissioned a piece entitled Sans. This process of musical creation was remarkable in that all participants had to work with a high degree of uncertainty regarding the nature of the project and, therefore, the distribution of roles and creative authority. This uncertainty permeated all aspects of the collaborative work that led up to the first public performance of Sans. The present paper is based on an ethnographic study of all the rehearsals John Tilbury and ONCEIM held together, as well as on semi-directed interviews conducted with various orchestra members. We first illustrate the deep ambivalence of John Tilbury’s attitude and preliminary instructions to the orchestra, which oscillated between two regulating approaches to musical activity. Next, we examine the various “prescriptive impulses” of some members of ONCEIM, which sought to fill the “vacuum of power” left by John Tilbury. Finally, within this largely indeterminate context of interaction, we show how musicians based their musical choices on deontic as well as organizational criteria.","PeriodicalId":300699,"journal":{"name":"Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/bssg.643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article examines the collaboration between ONCEIM—an orchestra made up of about thirty musicians specialised in musical improvisation —and the pianist and improviser John Tilbury, from whom ONCEIM commissioned a piece entitled Sans. This process of musical creation was remarkable in that all participants had to work with a high degree of uncertainty regarding the nature of the project and, therefore, the distribution of roles and creative authority. This uncertainty permeated all aspects of the collaborative work that led up to the first public performance of Sans. The present paper is based on an ethnographic study of all the rehearsals John Tilbury and ONCEIM held together, as well as on semi-directed interviews conducted with various orchestra members. We first illustrate the deep ambivalence of John Tilbury’s attitude and preliminary instructions to the orchestra, which oscillated between two regulating approaches to musical activity. Next, we examine the various “prescriptive impulses” of some members of ONCEIM, which sought to fill the “vacuum of power” left by John Tilbury. Finally, within this largely indeterminate context of interaction, we show how musicians based their musical choices on deontic as well as organizational criteria.
一个管弦乐队面临着不确定性的考验
这篇文章考察了ONCEIM(一个由大约30位专门从事音乐即兴创作的音乐家组成的乐团)和钢琴家兼即兴演奏家约翰·蒂尔伯里(John Tilbury)之间的合作,ONCEIM委托他创作了一首名为《Sans》的作品。这个音乐创作的过程非常特别,因为所有参与者都必须在项目性质的高度不确定性下工作,因此,角色和创作权威的分配。这种不确定性渗透到合作工作的各个方面,最终导致了《Sans》的首次公开演出。本文基于对约翰·蒂尔伯里和onceeim一起进行的所有排练的人种学研究,以及对各种管弦乐队成员进行的半定向采访。我们首先说明了约翰·蒂尔伯里的态度和对管弦乐队的初步指示的深刻矛盾心理,它在两种调节音乐活动的方法之间摇摆。接下来,我们将考察onceem一些成员的各种“规范性冲动”,这些成员试图填补约翰·蒂尔伯里留下的“权力真空”。最后,在这个很大程度上不确定的互动背景下,我们展示了音乐家如何基于道义和组织标准来选择音乐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信