Three +1 Perspectives on Computational Thinking

Sebastian Mateos Nicolajsen, Magda Pischetola, P. Grabarczyk, Claus Brabrand
{"title":"Three +1 Perspectives on Computational Thinking","authors":"Sebastian Mateos Nicolajsen, Magda Pischetola, P. Grabarczyk, Claus Brabrand","doi":"10.1145/3488042.3490024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computational Thinking (CT) is a highly contentious subject with many diverging meanings and definitions. This study presents a preliminary literature review of 71 peer-reviewed articles on CT. The papers indicate the existence of five main aspects that have historically been used in association with its definition: Algorithm, Abstraction, Modelling, Simulation, and Implementation. Based on this preliminary literature study, semi-structured interviews with eight CT scholars are conducted, in order to evaluate these aspects and to identify qualitatively different perspectives on CT, which integrate the mentioned aspects in different ways. From the interviews, three different perspectives emerged, focusing on: Reasoning, Simplification, and Automation. Furthermore, the goal of having computationally educated citizens is extrapolated from the interviews, indicating an additional perspective (+1) titled Empowerment, which appears as embedded within all the previous three perspectives. This paper proposes to put these three (+1) perspectives in dialogue, in an effort to support researchers and practitioners working with CT across different fields.","PeriodicalId":218947,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3488042.3490024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Computational Thinking (CT) is a highly contentious subject with many diverging meanings and definitions. This study presents a preliminary literature review of 71 peer-reviewed articles on CT. The papers indicate the existence of five main aspects that have historically been used in association with its definition: Algorithm, Abstraction, Modelling, Simulation, and Implementation. Based on this preliminary literature study, semi-structured interviews with eight CT scholars are conducted, in order to evaluate these aspects and to identify qualitatively different perspectives on CT, which integrate the mentioned aspects in different ways. From the interviews, three different perspectives emerged, focusing on: Reasoning, Simplification, and Automation. Furthermore, the goal of having computationally educated citizens is extrapolated from the interviews, indicating an additional perspective (+1) titled Empowerment, which appears as embedded within all the previous three perspectives. This paper proposes to put these three (+1) perspectives in dialogue, in an effort to support researchers and practitioners working with CT across different fields.
计算思维的三+1视角
计算思维(Computational Thinking, CT)是一个极具争议的学科,有许多不同的含义和定义。本研究对71篇同行评议的CT文章进行了初步的文献综述。这些论文指出,存在着历史上与其定义相关的五个主要方面:算法、抽象、建模、仿真和实现。在此初步文献研究的基础上,我们对8位CT学者进行了半结构化访谈,以评估这些方面,并从本质上识别不同的CT观点,这些观点以不同的方式整合了上述方面。从访谈中,出现了三个不同的观点,重点是:推理、简化和自动化。此外,拥有受过计算机教育的公民的目标是从访谈中推断出来的,这表明了一个名为赋权的额外视角(+1),它似乎嵌入在所有前三个视角中。本文建议将这三种(+1)观点置于对话中,以支持不同领域的CT研究人员和从业人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书