Leseleksens plass i norskfagets begynneropplæring

T. Hoem, Wagner Åse Kari H.
{"title":"Leseleksens plass i norskfagets begynneropplæring","authors":"T. Hoem, Wagner Åse Kari H.","doi":"10.23865/njlr.v8.3672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading homework in early literacy education (L1) in Norway Homework has a long tradition in schooling, despite mixed findings regarding its value and effect. Any positive value of homework will depend on how the homework is framed and followed up in the daily teaching. Based on filmed observations from six second-grade classrooms, this article examines what characterises homework-related reading and text work in L1 in Norway. We ask the following research questions: (1) What place does reading homework have in L1 instruction? and (2) What kind of text work takes place in connection with the reading homework? We find considerable variation in the amount of teaching time that is connected to homework-related work and how this work is framed and followed up. Homework appears to be most effective and meaningful when it forms an integral part of the teaching. Most of the texts used for reading homework are taken from school textbooks and focus on developing code skills and reading fluency, but this purpose is often not communicated beyond the expectation that the text will be read three times. Teaching does not include strategies for decoding or understanding what reading fluency entails. The synthesising of texts receives little attention, and students are not invited to reflect critically on the form or content. A lot of time is spent on organising the homework, with associated low learning outcomes. T. F. Hoem & Å. K. H. Wagner 190","PeriodicalId":315285,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Literacy Research","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Literacy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/njlr.v8.3672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading homework in early literacy education (L1) in Norway Homework has a long tradition in schooling, despite mixed findings regarding its value and effect. Any positive value of homework will depend on how the homework is framed and followed up in the daily teaching. Based on filmed observations from six second-grade classrooms, this article examines what characterises homework-related reading and text work in L1 in Norway. We ask the following research questions: (1) What place does reading homework have in L1 instruction? and (2) What kind of text work takes place in connection with the reading homework? We find considerable variation in the amount of teaching time that is connected to homework-related work and how this work is framed and followed up. Homework appears to be most effective and meaningful when it forms an integral part of the teaching. Most of the texts used for reading homework are taken from school textbooks and focus on developing code skills and reading fluency, but this purpose is often not communicated beyond the expectation that the text will be read three times. Teaching does not include strategies for decoding or understanding what reading fluency entails. The synthesising of texts receives little attention, and students are not invited to reflect critically on the form or content. A lot of time is spent on organising the homework, with associated low learning outcomes. T. F. Hoem & Å. K. H. Wagner 190
家庭作业在学校教育中有着悠久的传统,尽管关于其价值和效果的研究结果好坏参半。家庭作业的积极价值取决于如何在日常教学中对家庭作业进行框架和跟进。基于对六个二年级教室的录像观察,本文研究了挪威L1学生家庭作业阅读和文本作业的特点。我们提出了以下研究问题:(1)阅读作业在母语教学中的地位是什么?(2)与阅读作业相关的文本作业是什么样的?我们发现,在与家庭作业相关的教学时间以及如何安排和跟进这些工作方面,存在相当大的差异。当家庭作业成为教学的一个组成部分时,它显得最有效和最有意义。大多数用于阅读家庭作业的文本都取自学校教科书,侧重于开发代码技能和阅读流畅性,但这一目的通常不会超出文本将被阅读三遍的预期。教学不包括解码或理解阅读流畅性所需要的策略。文本的综合很少受到关注,学生也没有被邀请对形式或内容进行批判性的反思。大量的时间花在组织家庭作业上,与之相关的学习效果很低。t.f. Hoem & Å。k·h·瓦格纳190
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信