Optimizations of a permanent magnet machine targeting different driving cycles for electric vehicles

Liang Chen, Jiabin Wang, P. Lazari, Xiao Chen
{"title":"Optimizations of a permanent magnet machine targeting different driving cycles for electric vehicles","authors":"Liang Chen, Jiabin Wang, P. Lazari, Xiao Chen","doi":"10.1109/IEMDC.2013.6556198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper assesses the influence of driving cycles on the design optimizations of permanent magnet machines for electric vehicle traction applications with the objective to minimize total loss over a defined driving cycle while satisfying performance specifications and design constraints. With the help of an efficient optimization methodology and tool, the optimizations against New European Drive cycle (NEDC), Artemis Urban Drive Cycle (Artemis), and the NEDC/Artemis combined cycle are carried out using Finite Element (FE) based technique. It is shown that for a surface mounted permanent magnet machine studied in the paper, the optimization results against the NEDC and Artemis exhibit distinct characteristics in terms of torque, speed, and energy loss distributions. Thus optimization trends for leading machine design parameters such as split ratio, stator tooth width, turn number per coil and magnet usage to minimize total loss for NEDC and Artemis are very different. For NEDC, the optimum design inclines to reduce high-speed copper loss and iron loss; for Artemis, it tries to minimize low-speed copper loss. Comparing the three optimized motors targeting different driving cycles, it is observed that they all have very high efficiency over a wide toque-speed range, and perform the best in their own target cycle, and with around 0.5% lower efficiency, or 10% higher loss in the other cycles with respect to the optimum values. Compared to the motor optimized for Artemis, the motors optimized against NEDC and the combined cycle result in close to 20% less magnets and less copper usage, making NEDC or the combined driving cycle a preferred optimization target.","PeriodicalId":199452,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Electric Machines & Drives Conference","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"57","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Electric Machines & Drives Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMDC.2013.6556198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

Abstract

The paper assesses the influence of driving cycles on the design optimizations of permanent magnet machines for electric vehicle traction applications with the objective to minimize total loss over a defined driving cycle while satisfying performance specifications and design constraints. With the help of an efficient optimization methodology and tool, the optimizations against New European Drive cycle (NEDC), Artemis Urban Drive Cycle (Artemis), and the NEDC/Artemis combined cycle are carried out using Finite Element (FE) based technique. It is shown that for a surface mounted permanent magnet machine studied in the paper, the optimization results against the NEDC and Artemis exhibit distinct characteristics in terms of torque, speed, and energy loss distributions. Thus optimization trends for leading machine design parameters such as split ratio, stator tooth width, turn number per coil and magnet usage to minimize total loss for NEDC and Artemis are very different. For NEDC, the optimum design inclines to reduce high-speed copper loss and iron loss; for Artemis, it tries to minimize low-speed copper loss. Comparing the three optimized motors targeting different driving cycles, it is observed that they all have very high efficiency over a wide toque-speed range, and perform the best in their own target cycle, and with around 0.5% lower efficiency, or 10% higher loss in the other cycles with respect to the optimum values. Compared to the motor optimized for Artemis, the motors optimized against NEDC and the combined cycle result in close to 20% less magnets and less copper usage, making NEDC or the combined driving cycle a preferred optimization target.
针对电动汽车不同行驶周期的永磁电机优化
本文评估了驱动周期对电动汽车牵引用永磁电机设计优化的影响,目标是在满足性能规格和设计约束的情况下,在规定的驱动周期内将总损耗最小化。在高效优化方法和工具的帮助下,采用基于有限元的方法对新欧洲驱动循环(NEDC)、阿尔忒弥斯城市驱动循环(Artemis)和NEDC/Artemis联合循环进行了优化。结果表明,对于本文研究的表面贴装永磁电机,针对NEDC和Artemis的优化结果在转矩、速度和能量损失分布方面表现出明显的特点。因此,NEDC和Artemis的主要机器设计参数(如分割比、定子齿宽、每线圈匝数和磁体使用量)的优化趋势非常不同,以最大限度地减少总损耗。对于NEDC,优化设计倾向于降低高速铜损和铁损;对于Artemis来说,它试图将低速铜损耗降到最低。对比针对不同驱动周期的三种优化电机,可以观察到它们在宽转矩-转速范围内都具有非常高的效率,并且在自己的目标周期内表现最佳,并且相对于最优值,效率降低约0.5%,或在其他周期中损失增加10%。与针对Artemis优化的电机相比,针对NEDC和联合循环优化的电机减少了近20%的磁铁和更少的铜使用量,使NEDC或联合驱动循环成为首选的优化目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信