Order in Chaos: Prioritizing Mobile App Reviews using Consensus Algorithms

Layan Etaiwi, Sylvie Hamel, Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc, William Flageol, Rodrigo Morales
{"title":"Order in Chaos: Prioritizing Mobile App Reviews using Consensus Algorithms","authors":"Layan Etaiwi, Sylvie Hamel, Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc, William Flageol, Rodrigo Morales","doi":"10.1109/COMPSAC48688.2020.0-151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The continuous growth of the mobile apps industry creates a competition among apps developers. To succeed, app developers must attract and retain users. User reviews provide a wealth of information about bugs to fix and features to add and can help app developers offer high-quality apps. However, apps may receive hundreds of unstructured reviews, which makes transforming them into change requests a difficult task. Approaches exist for analyzing and extracting topics from mobile app reviews, however, prioritizing these reviews has not gained much attention. In this study, we introduce the use of a consensus algorithm to help developers prioritize user reviews for the purpose of app evolution. We evaluate the usefulness of our approach and meaningfulness of its consensus rankings on four Android apps. We compare the rankings against reviews ranked by app developers manually and show that there is a strong correlation between the two (average Kendall rank correlation coefficient = 0.516). Thus, our approach can prioritize user reviews and help developers focus their time/effort on improving their apps instead of on identifying reviews to address in the next release.","PeriodicalId":430098,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC48688.2020.0-151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The continuous growth of the mobile apps industry creates a competition among apps developers. To succeed, app developers must attract and retain users. User reviews provide a wealth of information about bugs to fix and features to add and can help app developers offer high-quality apps. However, apps may receive hundreds of unstructured reviews, which makes transforming them into change requests a difficult task. Approaches exist for analyzing and extracting topics from mobile app reviews, however, prioritizing these reviews has not gained much attention. In this study, we introduce the use of a consensus algorithm to help developers prioritize user reviews for the purpose of app evolution. We evaluate the usefulness of our approach and meaningfulness of its consensus rankings on four Android apps. We compare the rankings against reviews ranked by app developers manually and show that there is a strong correlation between the two (average Kendall rank correlation coefficient = 0.516). Thus, our approach can prioritize user reviews and help developers focus their time/effort on improving their apps instead of on identifying reviews to address in the next release.
混乱中的秩序:使用共识算法确定手机应用评论的优先级
手机应用行业的持续发展导致了应用开发者之间的竞争。为了取得成功,应用开发者必须吸引并留住用户。用户评论提供了大量关于漏洞修复和功能添加的信息,可以帮助应用开发者提供高质量的应用。然而,应用程序可能会收到数百条非结构化评论,这使得将它们转换为更改请求成为一项艰巨的任务。从手机应用评论中分析和提取主题的方法是存在的,然而,优先考虑这些评论却没有得到太多关注。在本研究中,我们介绍了共识算法的使用,以帮助开发人员优先考虑用户评论,以促进应用程序的发展。我们评估了我们的方法的有用性,以及它在四个Android应用程序上的共识排名的意义。我们将这些排名与应用开发者手动排名的评论进行比较,发现两者之间存在很强的相关性(平均肯德尔排名相关系数= 0.516)。因此,我们的方法可以优先考虑用户评论,并帮助开发者将时间/精力集中在改进应用上,而不是在下次发布时识别用户评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信