15 Integration of multiple immune-associated biomarkers facilitates classification of solid tumors by primary immune escape mode and prediction of patient outcomes

R. Seager, M. Senosain, Erik Van Roey, S. Gao, M. Nesline, J. Conroy, S. Pabla
{"title":"15 Integration of multiple immune-associated biomarkers facilitates classification of solid tumors by primary immune escape mode and prediction of patient outcomes","authors":"R. Seager, M. Senosain, Erik Van Roey, S. Gao, M. Nesline, J. Conroy, S. Pabla","doi":"10.1136/jitc-2022-sitc2022.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Many individual biomarkers describe the idiosyn-crasies of each tumor and its interactions with the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, tumors often evade immunotherapy through multiple immune escape mechanisms. Here, we present a method of integrating immune and neo-plastic biomarkers that classify tumor and immune activity in the TME. Methods Standard-of-care comprehensive genomic and immune profiling was performed on 5450 FFPE tumors representing 39 histologic types, assessing expression levels of 395 immune genes and >500 tumor-associated genes. From this data, three previously published gene expression signatures were calcu-lated: cell proliferation (CP), tumor immunogenic signature (TIGS), and cancer testis antigen burden (CTAB). PD-L1 status of each tumor was assessed by IHC, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated. Principle component analysis (PCA) and unsupervised clustering revealed four distinct bio-logical groups. Subsequently, a nearest neighbor method was used to classify an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treated 242-patient validation cohort (Lung cancer, melanoma and renal cell carcinoma) into these groups, the association between these groups and ICI treatment response was deter-mined by overrepresentation analysis, and overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meyer and CoxPH analyses. Results PCA and clustering generated four groups: 1) Tumor-dominant, exhibiting high CTAB, TMB, and CP, and low PD-L1 and TIGS; 2) Proliferative, exhibiting high CP and low TIGS, PD-L1, CTAB, and TMB; 3) Inflamed, exhibiting high TIGS and low CP, PD-L1, CTAB, and TMB; and 4) Checkpoint, exhibiting high PD-L1, TIGS, and TMB,","PeriodicalId":398566,"journal":{"name":"Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-sitc2022.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Many individual biomarkers describe the idiosyn-crasies of each tumor and its interactions with the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, tumors often evade immunotherapy through multiple immune escape mechanisms. Here, we present a method of integrating immune and neo-plastic biomarkers that classify tumor and immune activity in the TME. Methods Standard-of-care comprehensive genomic and immune profiling was performed on 5450 FFPE tumors representing 39 histologic types, assessing expression levels of 395 immune genes and >500 tumor-associated genes. From this data, three previously published gene expression signatures were calcu-lated: cell proliferation (CP), tumor immunogenic signature (TIGS), and cancer testis antigen burden (CTAB). PD-L1 status of each tumor was assessed by IHC, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated. Principle component analysis (PCA) and unsupervised clustering revealed four distinct bio-logical groups. Subsequently, a nearest neighbor method was used to classify an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treated 242-patient validation cohort (Lung cancer, melanoma and renal cell carcinoma) into these groups, the association between these groups and ICI treatment response was deter-mined by overrepresentation analysis, and overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meyer and CoxPH analyses. Results PCA and clustering generated four groups: 1) Tumor-dominant, exhibiting high CTAB, TMB, and CP, and low PD-L1 and TIGS; 2) Proliferative, exhibiting high CP and low TIGS, PD-L1, CTAB, and TMB; 3) Inflamed, exhibiting high TIGS and low CP, PD-L1, CTAB, and TMB; and 4) Checkpoint, exhibiting high PD-L1, TIGS, and TMB,
整合多种免疫相关生物标志物有助于通过原发性免疫逃逸模式对实体肿瘤进行分类并预测患者预后
许多个体生物标志物描述了每种肿瘤的特质及其与肿瘤微环境(TME)的相互作用。然而,肿瘤往往通过多种免疫逃逸机制逃避免疫治疗。在这里,我们提出了一种整合免疫和新塑性生物标志物的方法,用于分类TME中的肿瘤和免疫活性。方法对39种组织学类型的5450例FFPE肿瘤进行标准护理综合基因组和免疫谱分析,评估395个免疫基因和500多个肿瘤相关基因的表达水平。根据这些数据,计算了三个先前发表的基因表达特征:细胞增殖(CP),肿瘤免疫原性特征(TIGS)和癌睾丸抗原负担(CTAB)。通过免疫组化评估每个肿瘤的PD-L1状态,计算肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)。主成分分析(PCA)和无监督聚类揭示了四个不同的生物类群。随后,采用最近邻法将免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗的242例患者验证队列(肺癌、黑色素瘤和肾细胞癌)分为这些组,通过过度代表性分析确定这些组与ICI治疗反应之间的关系,并使用Kaplan-Meyer和cox - ph分析评估总生存率。结果PCA和聚类可分为4组:1)肿瘤优势组,CTAB、TMB、CP高,PD-L1、TIGS低;2)增生性,表现为高CP、低TIGS、PD-L1、CTAB、TMB;3)炎症,TIGS高,CP、PD-L1、CTAB、TMB低;4)检查点,表现出高PD-L1、TIGS和TMB;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信