Decolonization of Feminism in the Malayan Nationalist Movement: A Case Study of Ibu Zain and Shamsiah Fakeh

Asyiqah Binti Mohamad Jamil, Asilatul Hanaa Abdullah
{"title":"Decolonization of Feminism in the Malayan Nationalist Movement: A Case Study of Ibu Zain and Shamsiah Fakeh","authors":"Asyiqah Binti Mohamad Jamil, Asilatul Hanaa Abdullah","doi":"10.56529/mpr.v1i2.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The misrepresentation of Southeast Asians throughout history was often the results of the White Man’s burden doctrine practiced by Western colonialists, which clouded their perceptions of Southeast Asians, resulting in claims that Southeast Asians were inferior. This Eurocentric idea has distorted the representation of colonized nations in general. However, the worst Eurocentric fallacy is regarding Muslim women in Southeast Asia. They were not only misrepresented but also intimidated by the patriarchal nature of orientalism. Muslim women were, and indeed often still are, viewed as vulnerable victims that need to be saved from their men, making them quarry of double oppression. The most unfortunate part is even many modern white feminists still subscribe to these Eurocentric ideas. Thus, this paper aims to decolonize this narrative by illustrating the history of women’s involvement in politics from the time of the Malay Sultanate until post-World War II Malaya. This research also explores women’s participation in the far-right and far-left political movements in Malaya, with special references to Ibu Zain and Shamsiah Fakeh. We demonstrate the independence of Malayan women and affirm that they were well-presented in Malayan politics over this period of time.","PeriodicalId":165513,"journal":{"name":"Muslim Politics Review","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muslim Politics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56529/mpr.v1i2.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The misrepresentation of Southeast Asians throughout history was often the results of the White Man’s burden doctrine practiced by Western colonialists, which clouded their perceptions of Southeast Asians, resulting in claims that Southeast Asians were inferior. This Eurocentric idea has distorted the representation of colonized nations in general. However, the worst Eurocentric fallacy is regarding Muslim women in Southeast Asia. They were not only misrepresented but also intimidated by the patriarchal nature of orientalism. Muslim women were, and indeed often still are, viewed as vulnerable victims that need to be saved from their men, making them quarry of double oppression. The most unfortunate part is even many modern white feminists still subscribe to these Eurocentric ideas. Thus, this paper aims to decolonize this narrative by illustrating the history of women’s involvement in politics from the time of the Malay Sultanate until post-World War II Malaya. This research also explores women’s participation in the far-right and far-left political movements in Malaya, with special references to Ibu Zain and Shamsiah Fakeh. We demonstrate the independence of Malayan women and affirm that they were well-presented in Malayan politics over this period of time.
马来民族主义运动中女性主义的非殖民化:以伊布·再因和沙姆西亚·法克为例
历史上对东南亚人的歪曲往往是西方殖民主义者奉行的白人负担主义的结果,这种观念蒙蔽了他们对东南亚人的看法,导致东南亚人低人一等的说法。这种以欧洲为中心的观念在总体上扭曲了被殖民国家的形象。然而,最糟糕的以欧洲为中心的谬论是关于东南亚的穆斯林妇女。他们不仅被歪曲,而且被东方主义的男权本质所吓倒。穆斯林妇女过去被视为弱势的受害者,需要从他们的男人手中拯救出来,事实上,她们仍然经常被视为弱势的受害者,这使她们成为双重压迫的对象。最不幸的是,甚至许多现代白人女权主义者仍然赞同这些以欧洲为中心的观点。因此,本文旨在通过说明从马来苏丹国时期到第二次世界大战后马来亚妇女参与政治的历史,使这种叙述去殖民化。本研究还探讨了马来亚妇女参与极右翼和极左翼政治运动的情况,特别提到了伊布·再因和沙姆西亚·法克。我们展示了马来亚妇女的独立性,并确认她们在这段时间里在马来亚政治中得到了很好的体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信