BROKEN & UNEQUAL: THE SOUTH AFRICAN EDUCATION SYSTEM AND THE ATTAINMENT OF THE RIGHT TO BASIC EDUCATION THROUGH LITIGATION

Simon Mateus, Khalipha Shange
{"title":"BROKEN & UNEQUAL: THE SOUTH AFRICAN EDUCATION SYSTEM AND THE ATTAINMENT OF THE RIGHT TO BASIC EDUCATION THROUGH LITIGATION","authors":"Simon Mateus, Khalipha Shange","doi":"10.29053/PSLR.V15I1.3675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1994, South Africa transitioned into a new democratic and constitutional society. Since then, the South African Constitutionnecessitates the transformation of the public basic education system. A new public education system aimed at addressing the malaise of the past. To this end, South African jurisprudence recognises the right to basic education as a right that must be (i) equally accessible to all and (ii) immediately realisable without delay. However, the new education system has not completely succeeded in eliminating the legacy of apartheid, and there are residual differences and polarisation on various grounds, such as race and/or class. Accordingly, this article concedes that a critical survey of South African jurisprudence on the realisation of the right to basic education reveals that there are problems in the delivery of the right to basic education in South Africa. This is particularly the case in relation to black and/or poor South African pupils in the public education system. As such, the article intends to show that litigation (or the threat thereto), plays a fundamental role in the realisation and fulfilment of the right to basic education in South Africa.","PeriodicalId":253815,"journal":{"name":"The Pretoria Student Law Review","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Pretoria Student Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29053/PSLR.V15I1.3675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1994, South Africa transitioned into a new democratic and constitutional society. Since then, the South African Constitutionnecessitates the transformation of the public basic education system. A new public education system aimed at addressing the malaise of the past. To this end, South African jurisprudence recognises the right to basic education as a right that must be (i) equally accessible to all and (ii) immediately realisable without delay. However, the new education system has not completely succeeded in eliminating the legacy of apartheid, and there are residual differences and polarisation on various grounds, such as race and/or class. Accordingly, this article concedes that a critical survey of South African jurisprudence on the realisation of the right to basic education reveals that there are problems in the delivery of the right to basic education in South Africa. This is particularly the case in relation to black and/or poor South African pupils in the public education system. As such, the article intends to show that litigation (or the threat thereto), plays a fundamental role in the realisation and fulfilment of the right to basic education in South Africa.
破碎与不平等:南非教育制度与通过诉讼实现基础教育权
1994年,南非过渡到一个新的民主和宪政社会。此后,《南非宪法》要求对公共基础教育制度进行改革。新的公共教育制度旨在解决过去的弊病。为此目的,南非法理学承认基础教育权是一项必须(i)人人平等享有和(ii)立即毫不拖延地实现的权利。然而,新的教育制度并没有完全成功地消除种族隔离的遗留问题,仍然存在着基于种族和(或)阶级等各种理由的残余差异和两极分化。因此,本文承认,对南非基础教育权实现的法理进行批判性调查,可以发现南非基础教育权的实现存在问题。对于公立教育系统中的黑人和/或贫穷的南非学生来说,情况尤其如此。因此,这篇文章打算表明,诉讼(或威胁诉讼)在南非实现和实现基础教育权方面起着根本作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信