Argümantasyon Tabanlı Fen Öğretiminin Öğrencilerin Bilimsel Süreç Becerileri ve Akademik Başarılarına Etkisi

Seda Er, T. Kirindi
{"title":"Argümantasyon Tabanlı Fen Öğretiminin Öğrencilerin Bilimsel Süreç Becerileri ve Akademik Başarılarına Etkisi","authors":"Seda Er, T. Kirindi","doi":"10.30855/gjes.2020.06.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the researcher aimed to determine the effects of the science course that prepared via the argumentation-based learning method and the questioning-based learning method, to the scientific-process skills of the students and their academic achievements. Furthermore, we also examined the view of students about argumentation-based learning. The study consisted of 6th-grade student participants that taught in 2017-2018 education year in fall semester. The study included two groups whose success levels are similar to each other. One of them is treatment group (n=25) and the other one is control group (n=25) The study has been carried out within the scope of the science course. While control group was instructed by the activities in the book that is appropriate with curriculum, the experiment group instructed by the argumentation-based science learning activities. To obtain quantitative data researcher used “scientific process ability Scale” and “sciences achievement Scale” which has been applied as a pre-test-post-test method. To obtain qualitative data, we used semi-structured “argumentation interview form” with the aim to define students’ views about argumentation-based science teaching. For the analysis of quantitative data, whilst we used dependent t-test and independent t-test, for qualitative data, we used content-analysis technique. According to quantitative data analysis results, it has been found that argumentation-based learning had positive impact on students’ academic success levels in their progress of scientific process skills. Students’ views also supported these results. Besides, students stated positive opinions in their views that argumentation education promotes knowledge and increase the motivation towards the lesson.","PeriodicalId":224783,"journal":{"name":"Gazi Journal of Education Sciences","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gazi Journal of Education Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30855/gjes.2020.06.03.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this study, the researcher aimed to determine the effects of the science course that prepared via the argumentation-based learning method and the questioning-based learning method, to the scientific-process skills of the students and their academic achievements. Furthermore, we also examined the view of students about argumentation-based learning. The study consisted of 6th-grade student participants that taught in 2017-2018 education year in fall semester. The study included two groups whose success levels are similar to each other. One of them is treatment group (n=25) and the other one is control group (n=25) The study has been carried out within the scope of the science course. While control group was instructed by the activities in the book that is appropriate with curriculum, the experiment group instructed by the argumentation-based science learning activities. To obtain quantitative data researcher used “scientific process ability Scale” and “sciences achievement Scale” which has been applied as a pre-test-post-test method. To obtain qualitative data, we used semi-structured “argumentation interview form” with the aim to define students’ views about argumentation-based science teaching. For the analysis of quantitative data, whilst we used dependent t-test and independent t-test, for qualitative data, we used content-analysis technique. According to quantitative data analysis results, it has been found that argumentation-based learning had positive impact on students’ academic success levels in their progress of scientific process skills. Students’ views also supported these results. Besides, students stated positive opinions in their views that argumentation education promotes knowledge and increase the motivation towards the lesson.
在本研究中,研究者旨在确定以论证为基础的学习方法和以问题为基础的学习方法编写的科学课程对学生的科学过程技能和学业成绩的影响。此外,我们还调查了学生对议论文式学习的看法。该研究由2017-2018学年秋季学期授课的六年级学生组成。该研究包括两组,他们的成功程度彼此相似。其中一组为治疗组(n=25),另一组为对照组(n=25)。本研究是在理科课程范围内进行的。对照组采用与课程相适应的课本活动指导,实验组采用论证式科学学习活动指导。为了获得定量数据,研究者使用了“科学过程能力量表”和“科学成就量表”,这是一种前测后测的方法。为了获得定性数据,我们采用半结构化的“论证访谈形式”,目的是确定学生对基于论证的科学教学的看法。对于定量数据的分析,我们使用了依赖t检验和独立t检验,对于定性数据,我们使用了内容分析技术。定量数据分析结果发现,在科学过程技能的进步中,论证式学习对学生的学业成功水平有积极的影响。学生们的观点也支持了这些结果。此外,学生们在他们的观点中表达了积极的观点,即论证教育促进了知识的发展,增加了学习的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书