A Research on the Evaluation System and Determinants of Starting Point Fairness

Jingshui Sun, Pin-yen Wu
{"title":"A Research on the Evaluation System and Determinants of Starting Point Fairness","authors":"Jingshui Sun, Pin-yen Wu","doi":"10.2991/febm-19.2019.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article defines the connotation of starting point fairness, designs the evaluation indexes of starting point fairness, and puts forward the measure method of starting point fairness. Based on the panel data of 31 provinces from 1985 to 2017, the article conducts a statistical measure of starting point fairness and econometric analysis of the determinants of starting point fairness in China. The research results show that:(1) China's starting point fairness is relatively fair generally, showing an upward trend. Education equity and public health equity are very fair. Public infrastructure equity is quite fair. Public natural resources equity is relatively fair. Employment equity is relatively unfair. (2) Inequalities in education, employment, public health, public infrastructure and public natural resources have significant negative effects on the starting point fairness, vice versa. (3) Policy bias, urban-rural differences, and regional differences have significant negative effects on the starting point fairness. The relationship between opening-up and starting point fairness is a significant inverted U-type. Policy bias, urban-rural differences, regional differences and opening-up have further widened the negative effects of education inequality and employment inequality on the starting point fairness. The findings provide important policy implications. Keywords—starting point fairness; education equity; employment equity; evaluation system; determinants","PeriodicalId":417272,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Economic and Business Management (FEBM 2019)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Economic and Business Management (FEBM 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/febm-19.2019.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article defines the connotation of starting point fairness, designs the evaluation indexes of starting point fairness, and puts forward the measure method of starting point fairness. Based on the panel data of 31 provinces from 1985 to 2017, the article conducts a statistical measure of starting point fairness and econometric analysis of the determinants of starting point fairness in China. The research results show that:(1) China's starting point fairness is relatively fair generally, showing an upward trend. Education equity and public health equity are very fair. Public infrastructure equity is quite fair. Public natural resources equity is relatively fair. Employment equity is relatively unfair. (2) Inequalities in education, employment, public health, public infrastructure and public natural resources have significant negative effects on the starting point fairness, vice versa. (3) Policy bias, urban-rural differences, and regional differences have significant negative effects on the starting point fairness. The relationship between opening-up and starting point fairness is a significant inverted U-type. Policy bias, urban-rural differences, regional differences and opening-up have further widened the negative effects of education inequality and employment inequality on the starting point fairness. The findings provide important policy implications. Keywords—starting point fairness; education equity; employment equity; evaluation system; determinants
起点公平性评价体系及其决定因素研究
界定了起点公平性的内涵,设计了起点公平性的评价指标,提出了起点公平性的衡量方法。本文基于1985 - 2017年31个省份的面板数据,对中国起点公平进行了统计测度,并对起点公平的影响因素进行了计量分析。研究结果表明:(1)中国的起点公平总体上比较公平,并呈现上升趋势。教育公平和公共卫生公平是非常公平的。公共基础设施公平是相当公平的。公共自然资源公平相对公平。就业公平相对来说是不公平的。(2)教育、就业、公共卫生、公共基础设施和公共自然资源方面的不平等对起点公平有显著的负向影响,反之亦然。(3)政策偏差、城乡差异和地区差异对起点公平具有显著的负向影响。对外开放与起点公平之间存在显著的倒u型关系。政策偏差、城乡差异、区域差异和对外开放进一步扩大了教育不平等和就业不平等对起点公平的负面影响。研究结果提供了重要的政策启示。关键词:起点公平性;教育公平;就业权益;评价体系;决定因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信