Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Partial Checksum Protection in Wireless Video Streaming

J. Korhonen, Søren Forchhammer, K. J. Larsen
{"title":"Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Partial Checksum Protection in Wireless Video Streaming","authors":"J. Korhonen, Søren Forchhammer, K. J. Larsen","doi":"10.1109/ICMEW.2012.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The benefits of passing partially corrupted packets to the application instead of discarding them have been debated actively, since Lightweight User Data gram Protocol (UDP Lite) was introduced. UDP Lite allows partial check summing in order to omit bit errors in the non-critical part of the packet payload. Several studies have shown that data throughput over a link prone to bit errors can be significantly improved with partial check summing. However, the higher throughput comes at the cost of bit errors appearing in the non-critical parts of the payload. Therefore, the overall benefit depends highly on the capability of coping with errors at the application layer. In this paper, we present a theoretical framework for defining the optimal level of partial checksum protection, assuming that the bit error characteristics and the perceptual impact of bit errors appearing in the non-protected parts of the payload are known. We have also derived experimentally the distortion levels for video sequences coded with different bit rates and protection levels in the presence of bit errors. The results show that in some scenarios it is possible to improve the perceived overall video quality by using partial check summing.","PeriodicalId":385797,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMEW.2012.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The benefits of passing partially corrupted packets to the application instead of discarding them have been debated actively, since Lightweight User Data gram Protocol (UDP Lite) was introduced. UDP Lite allows partial check summing in order to omit bit errors in the non-critical part of the packet payload. Several studies have shown that data throughput over a link prone to bit errors can be significantly improved with partial check summing. However, the higher throughput comes at the cost of bit errors appearing in the non-critical parts of the payload. Therefore, the overall benefit depends highly on the capability of coping with errors at the application layer. In this paper, we present a theoretical framework for defining the optimal level of partial checksum protection, assuming that the bit error characteristics and the perceptual impact of bit errors appearing in the non-protected parts of the payload are known. We have also derived experimentally the distortion levels for video sequences coded with different bit rates and protection levels in the presence of bit errors. The results show that in some scenarios it is possible to improve the perceived overall video quality by using partial check summing.
无线视频流中部分校验和保护评估的理论框架
将部分损坏的数据包传递给应用程序而不是丢弃它们的好处,自从轻量级用户数据报文协议(UDP Lite)引入以来,一直存在激烈的争论。UDP Lite允许部分校验和,以便忽略数据包有效载荷的非关键部分的位错误。一些研究表明,部分校验和可以显著提高易出错链路上的数据吞吐量。然而,更高的吞吐量是以在负载的非关键部分出现位错误为代价的。因此,总体收益在很大程度上取决于在应用层处理错误的能力。在本文中,我们提出了一个理论框架来定义部分校验和保护的最佳水平,假设误码特征和误码在有效载荷的非保护部分出现的感知影响是已知的。我们还通过实验推导了在存在比特错误的情况下,用不同比特率和保护级别编码的视频序列的失真水平。结果表明,在某些情况下,使用部分校验和可以提高感知到的整体视频质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信