The Discourse on the Eighth and the Ninth (NHC VI,6), the Prayer of Thanksgiving (NHC VI,7), and the Asclepius (NHC VI,8): Hermetic Texts in Nag Hammadi and Their Bipartite View of Man
{"title":"The Discourse on the Eighth and the Ninth (NHC VI,6), the Prayer of Thanksgiving (NHC VI,7), and the Asclepius (NHC VI,8): Hermetic Texts in Nag Hammadi and Their Bipartite View of Man","authors":"L. R. Lanzillotta","doi":"10.1163/2451859X-12340102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn an article from 2017, I introduced the study of the anthropological framework of Nag Hammadi texts and established the existence in this corpus of two anthropological patterns, the bipartite and tripartite. The present study continues the analysis by means of an exhaustive investigation of the evidence provided by the three Hermetic treatises included in Nag Hammadi Codex VI, namely, the Discourse on the Eighth and the Ninth, the Prayer of Thanksgiving, and the fragment of Asclepius. It concludes that, far from presenting a tripartite anthropological framework, “die für die Gnosis typische trichotomische Anthropologie,” in the words of Karl-Wolfgang Tröger, these three Hermetic treatises only include a bipartite of view of the human being.","PeriodicalId":130908,"journal":{"name":"Gnosis: Journal of Gnostic Studies","volume":"243 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gnosis: Journal of Gnostic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2451859X-12340102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In an article from 2017, I introduced the study of the anthropological framework of Nag Hammadi texts and established the existence in this corpus of two anthropological patterns, the bipartite and tripartite. The present study continues the analysis by means of an exhaustive investigation of the evidence provided by the three Hermetic treatises included in Nag Hammadi Codex VI, namely, the Discourse on the Eighth and the Ninth, the Prayer of Thanksgiving, and the fragment of Asclepius. It concludes that, far from presenting a tripartite anthropological framework, “die für die Gnosis typische trichotomische Anthropologie,” in the words of Karl-Wolfgang Tröger, these three Hermetic treatises only include a bipartite of view of the human being.
在2017年的一篇文章中,我介绍了对拿格哈玛第文本的人类学框架的研究,并在这个语料库中确立了两种人类学模式的存在,即二部和三部。目前的研究继续分析的手段,详尽调查的证据提供了三个赫尔密斯论文包括在拿哈玛第第六法典,即第八和第九的话语,感恩祈祷,和阿斯克勒庇俄斯碎片。它的结论是,远远没有呈现出一个三部分的人类学框架,“die f r die Gnosis typische trichotomische Anthropologie”,用卡尔沃尔夫冈Tröger的话说,这三本赫尔墨斯的论文只包括了人类的两部分观点。