Perceived Teachers’ Justice and Perceived Teachers’ Authority

Radka Čopková
{"title":"Perceived Teachers’ Justice and Perceived Teachers’ Authority","authors":"Radka Čopková","doi":"10.2478/atd-2020-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: The presented study discusses the issues of teacher’s authority, its building and maintaining in the context of teacher’s justice. The main question to be answered is how high school students perceive teachers as authorities in relation with their perception of teacher’s justice. Purpose: The aim of the present article is the identification of the relationship between perceived teachers’ justice and perceived teachers’ authority among Slovak high school students. Methods: 159 Slovak high school students (120 males and 39 females) have participated in our study. Their average age was 17.2 years. The students have attended 3 kinds of high school - technical (49.7%), services (31.4%), and general (18.9%). Two questionnaires were administrated - Teacher Justice Scale (Dalbert & Maes, 2002) and Measurement for Omnisicient Authority Beliefs (Zhou, 2007). Data were examined by Pearson correlation, t-test and ANOVA. Results: The results have shown the significant positive relationship between perceived teachers’ justice and perceived teachers’ authority. No gender differences were identified. There are significant differences in general perceived teacher’s authority among secondary school students depending on their specialization - technical, services and grammar. Discussion: Results of the study support previous findings of Cseri (2013) and Gavora (2007) who point out the importance of teachers’ justice in building positive learning environment that support students’motivation to learn. Limitations: The proportion of male and female participants was not equal. Also the proportion of participants divided by school specialization was not equal. Conclusion: Accessing students fairly is not an easy task for any teacher, since perception of oneself as righteous may differ greatly from the perception of this apparent righteousness by individual students, who naturally dispose interindividual differences. It is extremely important that teachers pay attention to this fact not only at secondary schools but at all levels of the educational system, which is one of the basic pillars of public administration.","PeriodicalId":113905,"journal":{"name":"Acta Educationis Generalis","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Educationis Generalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2020-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The presented study discusses the issues of teacher’s authority, its building and maintaining in the context of teacher’s justice. The main question to be answered is how high school students perceive teachers as authorities in relation with their perception of teacher’s justice. Purpose: The aim of the present article is the identification of the relationship between perceived teachers’ justice and perceived teachers’ authority among Slovak high school students. Methods: 159 Slovak high school students (120 males and 39 females) have participated in our study. Their average age was 17.2 years. The students have attended 3 kinds of high school - technical (49.7%), services (31.4%), and general (18.9%). Two questionnaires were administrated - Teacher Justice Scale (Dalbert & Maes, 2002) and Measurement for Omnisicient Authority Beliefs (Zhou, 2007). Data were examined by Pearson correlation, t-test and ANOVA. Results: The results have shown the significant positive relationship between perceived teachers’ justice and perceived teachers’ authority. No gender differences were identified. There are significant differences in general perceived teacher’s authority among secondary school students depending on their specialization - technical, services and grammar. Discussion: Results of the study support previous findings of Cseri (2013) and Gavora (2007) who point out the importance of teachers’ justice in building positive learning environment that support students’motivation to learn. Limitations: The proportion of male and female participants was not equal. Also the proportion of participants divided by school specialization was not equal. Conclusion: Accessing students fairly is not an easy task for any teacher, since perception of oneself as righteous may differ greatly from the perception of this apparent righteousness by individual students, who naturally dispose interindividual differences. It is extremely important that teachers pay attention to this fact not only at secondary schools but at all levels of the educational system, which is one of the basic pillars of public administration.
感知教师公正与感知教师权威
摘要:本研究探讨了教师公正背景下的教师权威及其建构与维护问题。要回答的主要问题是高中生如何将教师视为权威与他们对教师公正的看法有关。目的:本文的目的是识别斯洛伐克高中生感知教师公正和感知教师权威之间的关系。方法:159名斯洛伐克高中生(男120名,女39名)参与了我们的研究。他们的平均年龄为17.2岁。学生就读于三种类型的高中:技术(49.7%)、服务(31.4%)和普通(18.9%)。采用教师公正量表(Dalbert & Maes, 2002)和全知权威信念量表(Zhou, 2007)进行问卷调查。数据采用Pearson相关、t检验和方差分析。结果:教师公平感与教师权威感呈显著正相关。没有发现性别差异。中学生对教师权威的总体感知存在显著差异,这取决于他们的专业——技术、服务和语法。讨论:本研究的结果支持了Cseri(2013)和Gavora(2007)先前的研究结果,他们指出教师公正在建立积极的学习环境以支持学生学习动机方面的重要性。局限性:男女参与者比例不相等。此外,按学校专业划分的参与者比例也不相等。结论:公平对待学生对任何老师来说都不是一件容易的事,因为自己对正义的看法可能与学生个人对这种表面正义的看法有很大的不同,学生个人自然会处理个体间的差异。极为重要的是,不仅在中学,而且在各级教育系统的教师都要注意这一事实,因为教育系统是公共行政的基本支柱之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信