The European Union fiscal policy framework and fiscal sustainability: challenges for the post-crisis environment

Urszula Kosterna
{"title":"The European Union fiscal policy framework and fiscal sustainability: challenges for the post-crisis environment","authors":"Urszula Kosterna","doi":"10.24136/ceref.2021.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fiscal policy framework in the European Union was originally agreed upon in the Maastricht Treaty 30 years ago. In the following years it has been supplemented (Stability and Growth Pact) and modified, influenced by the experience of its application practice and external shocks, such as the financial crisis. However, the essence of this framework remained the same - member states are obliged to conduct a disciplined fiscal policy, which, in a nutshell, is assessed by comparing the ratio of budget deficit and public debt to GDP in a given country to the reference values. Even before the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, the need to change the mechanisms for disciplining fiscal policy was widely recognized. High and persistent levels of public debt, pro-cyclicality of fiscal policy, shortage of public investment and the complexity of fiscal rules and their weak enforceability are indicated as unfavorable features of public finance. In 2019 the COVID-19 pandemic came as the biggest shock to the world community since World War II. In the context of the provisions on fiscal discipline, in May 2020 the Commission and the Council activated the general escape clause of Stability and Growth Pact, for the first time ever. This has allowed member states to take the necessary fiscal measures to deal with the crisis. On 19 October 2021, the European Commission adopted a Communication relaunching the public consultation, put on hold in March 2020, on the EU?s economic governance framework. The new governance framework should be tailored to the challenges the EU is facing, including the challenge of achieving a fiscal stance that is appropriate for the euro area as a whole.  There is a fairly widespread belief in the need to move away from rigid reference values, which should be replaced by solutions that ensure the sustainability of public debt in the differing circumstances of member states. The proposed options for the revision of the EU fiscal framework, although justified in theory, have a fundamental flaw - they strengthen the position of supranational institutions and, moreover, open the door to discretion and potentially unequal treatment of member states. These proposals can be seen in a broader context - the federalization of the EU, which would limit the sovereignty of nation states.","PeriodicalId":152320,"journal":{"name":"Central European Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24136/ceref.2021.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fiscal policy framework in the European Union was originally agreed upon in the Maastricht Treaty 30 years ago. In the following years it has been supplemented (Stability and Growth Pact) and modified, influenced by the experience of its application practice and external shocks, such as the financial crisis. However, the essence of this framework remained the same - member states are obliged to conduct a disciplined fiscal policy, which, in a nutshell, is assessed by comparing the ratio of budget deficit and public debt to GDP in a given country to the reference values. Even before the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, the need to change the mechanisms for disciplining fiscal policy was widely recognized. High and persistent levels of public debt, pro-cyclicality of fiscal policy, shortage of public investment and the complexity of fiscal rules and their weak enforceability are indicated as unfavorable features of public finance. In 2019 the COVID-19 pandemic came as the biggest shock to the world community since World War II. In the context of the provisions on fiscal discipline, in May 2020 the Commission and the Council activated the general escape clause of Stability and Growth Pact, for the first time ever. This has allowed member states to take the necessary fiscal measures to deal with the crisis. On 19 October 2021, the European Commission adopted a Communication relaunching the public consultation, put on hold in March 2020, on the EU?s economic governance framework. The new governance framework should be tailored to the challenges the EU is facing, including the challenge of achieving a fiscal stance that is appropriate for the euro area as a whole.  There is a fairly widespread belief in the need to move away from rigid reference values, which should be replaced by solutions that ensure the sustainability of public debt in the differing circumstances of member states. The proposed options for the revision of the EU fiscal framework, although justified in theory, have a fundamental flaw - they strengthen the position of supranational institutions and, moreover, open the door to discretion and potentially unequal treatment of member states. These proposals can be seen in a broader context - the federalization of the EU, which would limit the sovereignty of nation states.
欧盟财政政策框架与财政可持续性:危机后环境的挑战
欧盟的财政政策框架最初是在30年前的《马斯特里赫特条约》(Maastricht Treaty)中商定的。在随后的几年中,受其应用实践经验和金融危机等外部冲击的影响,对《稳定与增长公约》进行了补充和修改。然而,这一框架的本质保持不变——成员国有义务执行有纪律的财政政策,简而言之,这是通过将某一特定国家的预算赤字和公共债务与国内生产总值的比率与参考值进行比较来评估的。即使在2019冠状病毒病大流行爆发之前,人们就广泛认识到有必要改变财政政策纪律机制。公共债务的高企和持续水平、财政政策的顺周期性、公共投资的短缺以及财政规则的复杂性及其可执行性弱被认为是公共财政的不利特征。2019年,新冠肺炎疫情给国际社会带来了二战以来最大的冲击。在财政纪律条款的背景下,2020年5月,欧盟委员会和欧盟理事会有史以来首次启动了《稳定与增长公约》的一般免责条款。这使得成员国能够采取必要的财政措施来应对危机。2021年10月19日,欧盟委员会通过了一份通报,重新启动了于2020年3月暂停的公众咨询。美国经济治理框架。新的治理框架应针对欧盟面临的挑战进行调整,包括实现适合整个欧元区的财政立场的挑战。人们普遍认为,有必要摆脱僵化的参考值,取而代之的应该是在成员国不同情况下确保公共债务可持续性的解决方案。拟议中的欧盟财政框架修订方案尽管在理论上是合理的,但却存在一个根本性缺陷——它们强化了超国家机构的地位,此外,还为自由裁量权打开了大门,并可能对成员国造成不平等待遇。这些建议可以在更广泛的背景下看到——欧盟的联邦化,这将限制民族国家的主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信