The Complex Dynamics of Team Situation Awareness in Human-Autonomy Teaming

David A. Grimm, Mustafa Demir, Jamie C. Gorman, Nancy J. Cooke
{"title":"The Complex Dynamics of Team Situation Awareness in Human-Autonomy Teaming","authors":"David A. Grimm, Mustafa Demir, Jamie C. Gorman, Nancy J. Cooke","doi":"10.1109/COGSIMA.2018.8423990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores how Human-Autonomy Teams work together in a Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS) to overcome three types of degraded conditions, including automation and autonomy failures, and malicious attack. The two human participants were informed that the pilot was a “synthetic” agent that has limited communication capacity. For in-depth exploratory analysis, we identified one high- and one low- performing team in terms of overcoming failures and malicious attack, and then we used nonlinear dynamical methods to understand how human-autonomy interactions might affect overall Team Situation Awareness (TSA) in terms of level of complexity. We first produced Joint Recurrence Plots (JRP) to demonstrate predictability of team communication behavior during the TSA. After that, in order to identify how flexible the team was during degraded conditions, we examined entropy across four layers to represent RPAS:communication - chat-based interactions; vehicle - the RPA itself; control - user interface; and system - total activity of all layers. Results from the JRP showed that the high performing team communicated more effectively than the low performing team during the all three types of failures, while the entropy analysis showed that the high performing team appeared to be more flexible in their communication and overall system patterns.","PeriodicalId":231353,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2018.8423990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This study explores how Human-Autonomy Teams work together in a Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS) to overcome three types of degraded conditions, including automation and autonomy failures, and malicious attack. The two human participants were informed that the pilot was a “synthetic” agent that has limited communication capacity. For in-depth exploratory analysis, we identified one high- and one low- performing team in terms of overcoming failures and malicious attack, and then we used nonlinear dynamical methods to understand how human-autonomy interactions might affect overall Team Situation Awareness (TSA) in terms of level of complexity. We first produced Joint Recurrence Plots (JRP) to demonstrate predictability of team communication behavior during the TSA. After that, in order to identify how flexible the team was during degraded conditions, we examined entropy across four layers to represent RPAS:communication - chat-based interactions; vehicle - the RPA itself; control - user interface; and system - total activity of all layers. Results from the JRP showed that the high performing team communicated more effectively than the low performing team during the all three types of failures, while the entropy analysis showed that the high performing team appeared to be more flexible in their communication and overall system patterns.
人-自主团队情境意识的复杂动力学研究
本研究探讨了人类自主团队如何在远程驾驶飞机系统(RPAS)中协同工作,以克服三种类型的退化条件,包括自动化和自主故障以及恶意攻击。两名人类参与者被告知,飞行员是一名“合成”特工,通信能力有限。为了进行深入的探索性分析,我们在克服失败和恶意攻击方面确定了一个高绩效团队和一个低绩效团队,然后我们使用非线性动力学方法来理解人类自主交互如何影响整体团队态势感知(TSA)的复杂性水平。我们首先制作了联合递归图(JRP)来证明TSA期间团队沟通行为的可预测性。之后,为了确定团队在退化条件下的灵活性,我们检查了四个层的熵来表示RPAS:通信-基于聊天的交互;vehicle——RPA本身;控制-用户界面;和系统-所有层的总活动。JRP的结果表明,在所有三种类型的失败中,高绩效团队的沟通比低绩效团队更有效,而熵分析表明,高绩效团队的沟通和整体系统模式似乎更灵活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信