The differences in us foreign policy towards the UN and ICC in Trump and Biden administrations

M. Novaković
{"title":"The differences in us foreign policy towards the UN and ICC in Trump and Biden administrations","authors":"M. Novaković","doi":"10.2298/medjp2204611n","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"United States foreign policy has been the subject of numerous debates,\n articles, books, and policy research. This is a consequence of the\n overwhelming presence and dominance of the United States over the past\n decades on the international stage. One particularly interesting aspect of\n the US foreign policy is its relation with the United Nations. As one of the\n founders and most influential members of the United Nations, the United\n States? position is under a lot of scrutiny as it represents one of the main\n drivers of the UN policy. In this article, the author will investigate how\n the first year and a half of the Biden administration influenced US-UN\n relations. A special place will be given to the Trump administration?s\n approach to the UN-US relation, but a historical context will also be given.\n The methodology used for data collection focused on US and UN documents and\n resolutions, as well as the most relevant and current international and\n national authors, that focused on particular elements relevant to the\n research. This kind of analysis requires a historical approach to legal\n research, which was utilized for comparative analysis in this article. One\n of the conclusions was that regardless of how unconventional and destructive\n the Trump administration was towards the UN, it did not disrupt the constant\n of the US-UN relations.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp2204611n","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

United States foreign policy has been the subject of numerous debates, articles, books, and policy research. This is a consequence of the overwhelming presence and dominance of the United States over the past decades on the international stage. One particularly interesting aspect of the US foreign policy is its relation with the United Nations. As one of the founders and most influential members of the United Nations, the United States? position is under a lot of scrutiny as it represents one of the main drivers of the UN policy. In this article, the author will investigate how the first year and a half of the Biden administration influenced US-UN relations. A special place will be given to the Trump administration?s approach to the UN-US relation, but a historical context will also be given. The methodology used for data collection focused on US and UN documents and resolutions, as well as the most relevant and current international and national authors, that focused on particular elements relevant to the research. This kind of analysis requires a historical approach to legal research, which was utilized for comparative analysis in this article. One of the conclusions was that regardless of how unconventional and destructive the Trump administration was towards the UN, it did not disrupt the constant of the US-UN relations.
特朗普和拜登政府对联合国和国际刑事法院的外交政策差异
美国的外交政策一直是众多辩论、文章、书籍和政策研究的主题。这是过去几十年来美国在国际舞台上压倒性存在和主导地位的结果。美国外交政策中一个特别有趣的方面是它与联合国的关系。作为联合国的创始国和最有影响力的成员之一,美国?这一立场受到了很多审查,因为它代表了联合国政策的主要推动力之一。在这篇文章中,作者将调查拜登政府的第一年半如何影响美国与联合国的关系。特朗普政府将获得一个特殊的位置?同时,本文也将给出一个历史背景。用于数据收集的方法侧重于美国和联合国的文件和决议,以及最相关和当前的国际和国家作者,这些作者专注于与研究相关的特定元素。这种分析需要用历史的方法来进行法律研究,本文采用了历史的方法进行比较分析。其中一个结论是,无论特朗普政府对联合国的态度多么非常规和破坏性,它都没有破坏美国与联合国关系的稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信