Dealing with Uncertainties in Socially Responsible Design

Anders Haug, Jacob Busch
{"title":"Dealing with Uncertainties in Socially Responsible Design","authors":"Anders Haug, Jacob Busch","doi":"10.21606/nordes.2017.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, a plethora of books and papers on socially responsible design has emerged. This literature, however, is far from having solved the environmental and social problems faced by the world today. This paper focuses on a major problem of socially responsible design initiatives, namely that, although they may have the best intentions, they often have minimal, if any, positive impact. A central reason for this is the uncertainties associated with the effects of such designs, which is also often used as an argument against initiating more ambitious projects. More specifically, sometimes we are unsure about what effects a socially responsible design will produce, and sometimes we are unsure or disagree about whether its effects are ethically sound, in particular, when they involve someone having to make sacrifices. To be able to choose a more ambitious path, we need to better understand the uncertainties associated with socially responsible designs and to reconsider the ethical assumptions guiding our choices. This issue is addressed by defining a framework for understanding uncertainties associated with such projects and by arguing for a consequentialist ethics to govern socially responsible design. DYNAMICS","PeriodicalId":377953,"journal":{"name":"Nordes 2017: Design and Power","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordes 2017: Design and Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21606/nordes.2017.034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, a plethora of books and papers on socially responsible design has emerged. This literature, however, is far from having solved the environmental and social problems faced by the world today. This paper focuses on a major problem of socially responsible design initiatives, namely that, although they may have the best intentions, they often have minimal, if any, positive impact. A central reason for this is the uncertainties associated with the effects of such designs, which is also often used as an argument against initiating more ambitious projects. More specifically, sometimes we are unsure about what effects a socially responsible design will produce, and sometimes we are unsure or disagree about whether its effects are ethically sound, in particular, when they involve someone having to make sacrifices. To be able to choose a more ambitious path, we need to better understand the uncertainties associated with socially responsible designs and to reconsider the ethical assumptions guiding our choices. This issue is addressed by defining a framework for understanding uncertainties associated with such projects and by arguing for a consequentialist ethics to govern socially responsible design. DYNAMICS
处理社会责任设计中的不确定性
近几十年来,出现了大量关于社会责任设计的书籍和论文。然而,这些文献远远没有解决当今世界面临的环境和社会问题。本文关注社会责任设计倡议的一个主要问题,即,尽管它们可能有最好的意图,但它们通常只有最小的积极影响。造成这种情况的一个主要原因是与此类设计的影响相关的不确定性,这也经常被用作反对启动更雄心勃勃的项目的理由。更具体地说,有时我们不确定对社会负责的设计会产生什么影响,有时我们不确定或不同意其影响是否合乎道德,特别是当它们涉及到某人必须做出牺牲时。为了能够选择一条更加雄心勃勃的道路,我们需要更好地理解与社会责任设计相关的不确定性,并重新考虑指导我们选择的道德假设。这个问题是通过定义一个框架来理解与此类项目相关的不确定性,并通过争论结果主义伦理来管理社会责任设计来解决的。动力学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书