The Use of the Past Tenses in European Portuguese by Slovene Students: The Causes of Possible Deviations

Mojca Medvedšek, B. Müller
{"title":"The Use of the Past Tenses in European Portuguese by Slovene Students: The Causes of Possible Deviations","authors":"Mojca Medvedšek, B. Müller","doi":"10.2478/clb-2020-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The analysis presented in this article aims to ascertain what conditions of use imply deviations in the use of the Past tenses in European Portuguese (PPS, PPC, PI, PMQC) by Slovene learners of Portuguese, A2-B1 level (QECRL), trying to find explanations for its occurrence. The analysis shows the contrast between European Portuguese and Slovenian language in the domain of the Past tenses in terms of tense and aspect, describes the most frequent and evident deviations in a corpus, consisting of the various genres of texts, worksheets, completed by the students. Several presumptions were verified in the qualitative analysis. Among them, the deviations are in most cases due to the fact that in the sphere of the past, the Slovene language is operating with only one paradigm of the past sphere, the preteklik (Past tense), which is supposed to mark all the temporal and aspectual nuances of four Portuguese past tenses of the Indicative. The article tries to underline the different way of marking time and aspect in the respective languages and therefore the students’ difficulties in the perception of temporal and aspectual perfect / imperfect conceptualization.","PeriodicalId":398624,"journal":{"name":"Lucian Blaga Yearbook","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lucian Blaga Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/clb-2020-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The analysis presented in this article aims to ascertain what conditions of use imply deviations in the use of the Past tenses in European Portuguese (PPS, PPC, PI, PMQC) by Slovene learners of Portuguese, A2-B1 level (QECRL), trying to find explanations for its occurrence. The analysis shows the contrast between European Portuguese and Slovenian language in the domain of the Past tenses in terms of tense and aspect, describes the most frequent and evident deviations in a corpus, consisting of the various genres of texts, worksheets, completed by the students. Several presumptions were verified in the qualitative analysis. Among them, the deviations are in most cases due to the fact that in the sphere of the past, the Slovene language is operating with only one paradigm of the past sphere, the preteklik (Past tense), which is supposed to mark all the temporal and aspectual nuances of four Portuguese past tenses of the Indicative. The article tries to underline the different way of marking time and aspect in the respective languages and therefore the students’ difficulties in the perception of temporal and aspectual perfect / imperfect conceptualization.
斯洛文尼亚学生对欧洲葡萄牙语过去时的使用:可能偏差的原因
本文旨在探讨斯洛文尼亚A2-B1级(QECRL)葡萄牙语学习者在欧洲葡萄牙语(PPS、PPC、PI、PMQC)中使用过去时的情况,并试图找到其发生的原因。分析显示了欧洲葡萄牙语和斯洛文尼亚语在过去时态方面的对比,描述了语料库中最常见和最明显的偏差,包括各种类型的文本,工作表,由学生完成。在定性分析中验证了几个假设。其中,在大多数情况下,偏差是由于在过去领域,斯洛文尼亚语只使用过去领域的一种范式,即preteklik(过去时),它应该标记葡萄牙语指示性过去时态的所有时间和方面的细微差别。本文试图强调在不同的语言中标注时间和方面的不同方式,以及由此导致的学生在感知时间和方面的完整/不完整概念方面的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信