Švejk, Jan Dítě, Samko Tále and the First Thai Adaptation of the (Not So) Good Soldier Sha-Wake: Transnational Significance of the “Small” and “Childlike” Characters in Czech and Slovak Literature

Verita Sriratana
{"title":"Švejk, Jan Dítě, Samko Tále and the First Thai Adaptation of the (Not So) Good Soldier Sha-Wake: Transnational Significance of the “Small” and “Childlike” Characters in Czech and Slovak Literature","authors":"Verita Sriratana","doi":"10.18778/8142-286-4.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"n Europe there are the large countries on one side and the small on the other; there are the nations seated in the negotiating chambers and those who wait all night in the antechambers,”1 wrote Milan Kundera (1929– ). In his discussion of Neville Chamberlain’s description of Czechoslovakia as “[a] faraway country of which we know little,”2 Kundera criticises the British Prime Minister’s justification of the Munich Pact and describes the signing away of Czechoslovakia as a shameless sacrifice of the small and insignificant [Czechoslovakia] for the greater [British] good. It can be said that Kundera’s negotiating chambers versus antechambers categorisation of world power complements his controversial notion of a particular “Czech destiny” [“Český úděl”]3, which led to his public row with Václav Havel (1936–2011), who believed one must be the master of one’s own political destiny. Kundera’s idea of how a small country can never escape its resigned and predestined fate of forever being small and powerless, has often been un-","PeriodicalId":227308,"journal":{"name":"What’s New in the New Europe? Redefining Culture, Politics, Identity","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"What’s New in the New Europe? Redefining Culture, Politics, Identity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/8142-286-4.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

n Europe there are the large countries on one side and the small on the other; there are the nations seated in the negotiating chambers and those who wait all night in the antechambers,”1 wrote Milan Kundera (1929– ). In his discussion of Neville Chamberlain’s description of Czechoslovakia as “[a] faraway country of which we know little,”2 Kundera criticises the British Prime Minister’s justification of the Munich Pact and describes the signing away of Czechoslovakia as a shameless sacrifice of the small and insignificant [Czechoslovakia] for the greater [British] good. It can be said that Kundera’s negotiating chambers versus antechambers categorisation of world power complements his controversial notion of a particular “Czech destiny” [“Český úděl”]3, which led to his public row with Václav Havel (1936–2011), who believed one must be the master of one’s own political destiny. Kundera’s idea of how a small country can never escape its resigned and predestined fate of forever being small and powerless, has often been un-
Švejk, Jan Dítě, Samko Tále与《不太好的士兵沙维克》的第一次泰国改编:捷克和斯洛伐克文学中“小”与“幼稚”人物的跨国意义
在欧洲,大国在一边,小国在另一边;“有的国家坐在谈判厅里,有的国家整夜守候在前厅里,”米兰·昆德拉(1929 -)写道。在讨论内维尔·张伯伦将捷克斯洛伐克描述为“一个我们知之甚少的遥远国家”时,昆德拉批评了英国首相为《慕尼黑条约》辩护的理由,并将捷克斯洛伐克的签署描述为一个微不足道的小国(捷克斯洛伐克)为了更大的(英国)利益而做出的无耻牺牲。可以说,昆德拉对世界权力的谈判室与前厅分类补充了他有争议的特定“捷克命运”概念[“Český úděl”]3,这导致了他与Václav哈维尔(1936-2011)的公开争吵,后者认为一个人必须成为自己政治命运的主人。昆德拉认为,一个小国永远无法逃脱其无可奈何的宿命,永远是小国和无能为力的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信