The Principle of Appropriate and Proportionate Remuneration in Copyright Contracts and Its Implementation in the Baltic States

Ramūnas Birštonas, V. Mantrov, Aleksei Kelli
{"title":"The Principle of Appropriate and Proportionate Remuneration in Copyright Contracts and Its Implementation in the Baltic States","authors":"Ramūnas Birštonas, V. Mantrov, Aleksei Kelli","doi":"10.22364/iscflul.8.2.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Digital Single Market Directive 2019/790 constitutes a significant milestone in the field of copyright, especially its provisions aimed to ensure the fair remuneration for authors and performers. This publication focuses on Art. 18 of the Directive, which establishes the principle of appropriate and proportionate remuneration. This principle follows from the general understanding of authors and performers as a weaker bargaining party. Being formulated abstractly, the principle of appropriate and proportionate remuneration leaves broad discretion for its implementation. Therefore, the article presents case studies concerning the implementation of the said principle into national laws of the three Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. The first task is to check the operation of the principle of appropriate and proportionate remuneration in the national legal acts before the implementation of the Digital Single Market Directive. The second task is to compare and assess the prepared national draft legal acts and how they implement this principle. The article concludes that all three Baltic States have chosen a “minimalist” implementation strategy and, as a consequence, the appropriate and proportionate remuneration principle most likely will have no real independent value.","PeriodicalId":314457,"journal":{"name":"New Legal Reality: Challenges and Perspectives. II","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Legal Reality: Challenges and Perspectives. II","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.8.2.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Digital Single Market Directive 2019/790 constitutes a significant milestone in the field of copyright, especially its provisions aimed to ensure the fair remuneration for authors and performers. This publication focuses on Art. 18 of the Directive, which establishes the principle of appropriate and proportionate remuneration. This principle follows from the general understanding of authors and performers as a weaker bargaining party. Being formulated abstractly, the principle of appropriate and proportionate remuneration leaves broad discretion for its implementation. Therefore, the article presents case studies concerning the implementation of the said principle into national laws of the three Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. The first task is to check the operation of the principle of appropriate and proportionate remuneration in the national legal acts before the implementation of the Digital Single Market Directive. The second task is to compare and assess the prepared national draft legal acts and how they implement this principle. The article concludes that all three Baltic States have chosen a “minimalist” implementation strategy and, as a consequence, the appropriate and proportionate remuneration principle most likely will have no real independent value.
版权合同中适当和相称报酬原则及其在波罗的海国家的实施
《数字单一市场指令2019/790》是版权领域的一个重要里程碑,特别是其旨在确保作者和表演者获得公平报酬的条款。本出版物的重点是该指令第18条,该条规定了适当和相称报酬的原则。这一原则源于对作者和表演者作为较弱的谈判方的一般理解。适当和相称的薪酬原则是抽象的,因此在执行方面有很大的自由裁量权。因此,本文提出了有关在爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚和立陶宛这三个波罗的海国家的国内法中实施上述原则的案例研究。第一项任务是在数字单一市场指令实施前,检查报酬适当和比例原则在国家法律行为中的运行情况。第二项任务是比较和评估拟定的国家法律草案以及它们如何执行这一原则。该条的结论是,所有三个波罗的海国家都选择了“最低限度”的执行战略,因此,适当和相称的薪酬原则很可能没有真正的独立价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信