Existential phenomenology of religious liberty and security in religion and politics: A case study of Nigeria

M. Dukor
{"title":"Existential phenomenology of religious liberty and security in religion and politics: A case study of Nigeria","authors":"M. Dukor","doi":"10.5897/PPR2019.0163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"That peace and justice is the solution to the flux and insecurity in the church and in the state cannot be denied. In fact, it is exigent to ask this question thus: can there be peace and justice in the religious institution in the first instance, without religious liberty and of course, civil liberty untwisted? There is no gain-saying the fact that sacred and secular histories have tended to answer this question in a clear and precise illumination. In answering the aforementioned question as a stimulus to conversation and discussion on this topic we have to remind ourselves that this is a question that had been tinkered about and had received rigorous and provoking thoughts in the evolution of mankind. Religious bigotry is a global flux and spike leading to social, ethnic, racist, political and religious wars of which the insecurity in the religious institution and among nation-states are effects. Global insight into what we have called Adamic crisis or flux must begin with appreciation of the historicist and phenomenological trajectory of its essence as well as the ontology and theodicy of its origin. In this essay religious liberty as far as insecurity, injustice and instability in the religious institution and in the state are concerned, is a prime liberty among civil liberties, and as far as religion has become interlaced with social and political generation and development, religious liberty must not be compromised. \n \n   \n \n Key words: Existential phenomenology, religious liberty, security, religion, politics.","PeriodicalId":360092,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Papers and Review","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Papers and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/PPR2019.0163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

That peace and justice is the solution to the flux and insecurity in the church and in the state cannot be denied. In fact, it is exigent to ask this question thus: can there be peace and justice in the religious institution in the first instance, without religious liberty and of course, civil liberty untwisted? There is no gain-saying the fact that sacred and secular histories have tended to answer this question in a clear and precise illumination. In answering the aforementioned question as a stimulus to conversation and discussion on this topic we have to remind ourselves that this is a question that had been tinkered about and had received rigorous and provoking thoughts in the evolution of mankind. Religious bigotry is a global flux and spike leading to social, ethnic, racist, political and religious wars of which the insecurity in the religious institution and among nation-states are effects. Global insight into what we have called Adamic crisis or flux must begin with appreciation of the historicist and phenomenological trajectory of its essence as well as the ontology and theodicy of its origin. In this essay religious liberty as far as insecurity, injustice and instability in the religious institution and in the state are concerned, is a prime liberty among civil liberties, and as far as religion has become interlaced with social and political generation and development, religious liberty must not be compromised.   Key words: Existential phenomenology, religious liberty, security, religion, politics.
宗教与政治中宗教自由与安全的存在现象学:以尼日利亚为例
和平与正义是解决教会和国家的动荡和不安全的办法,这是不可否认的。事实上,迫切需要提出这样一个问题:首先,在宗教机构中,如果没有宗教自由,当然也没有不扭曲的公民自由,能否有和平与正义?毫无疑问,神圣的和世俗的历史都倾向于清楚而准确地回答这个问题。在回答上述问题作为对这个话题的对话和讨论的刺激时,我们必须提醒自己,这是一个在人类进化过程中被修修补补过的问题,并得到了严谨而发人深省的思考。宗教偏见是一种全球性的流动和高峰,导致社会,种族,种族主义,政治和宗教战争,宗教机构和民族国家之间的不安全感是其影响。对我们所说的亚当危机或流变的全局洞察,必须从对其本质的历史主义和现象学轨迹的欣赏,以及对其起源的本体论和神正论的欣赏开始。在这篇文章中,就宗教机构和国家的不安全、不公正和不稳定而言,宗教自由是公民自由中的一项主要自由,只要宗教与社会和政治的产生和发展交织在一起,宗教自由就不能妥协。关键词:存在现象学,宗教自由,安全,宗教,政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书