Training primary care providers in opioid deprescribing and chronic pain management based on local guidance: a pre–post study of attitude change

Ruth White, C. Hayes, A. Boyes, Sandra Fitzgerald, H. Rajappa, C. Paul
{"title":"Training primary care providers in opioid deprescribing and chronic pain management based on local guidance: a pre–post study of attitude change","authors":"Ruth White, C. Hayes, A. Boyes, Sandra Fitzgerald, H. Rajappa, C. Paul","doi":"10.33966/HEPJ.2.1.13209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Local chronic non-cancer pain guidance recommends that general practitioners should consider opioid deprescribing and referral to multidisciplinary healthcare providers for behaviourally based treatments. We designed a training package called AIMM (Assess, Inform, Manage and Monitor) to reinforce this stewardship.Aim. To identify whether participation in AIMM training effectively aligned clinicians’ attitudes with local guidance for treating chronic non-cancer pain.Design and setting. In 2014–15, the AIMM training was tested using a pre–post-test non-randomised design at two sites in NSW, Australia. The primary outcome measure was an 11-item, study-specific, pain attitude questionnaire (PAQ).Method. Step one of AIMM training involved online completion of the PAQ and review of a specialist pain website. Step two involved attendance at two face-to-face, two-hour interactive workshops led by pain experts who addressed opioid deprescribing and switching to broader care. A repeat PAQ survey was completed at the conclusion of the second workshop.Results. Nineteen participants attended the workshops, including general practitioners (n = 7), nurses (n = 5), exercise physiologists (n = 2), a dietitian (n = 1), community pharmacists (n = 2) and psychologists (n = 2). Significant shifts in six attitudes occurred, including prescribing less pain medication, greater emphasis on social reconnection, increasing planned activity and adopting anti-inflammatory nutrition (p < .05). Responses to the item regarding expectations of a positive recovery was not aligned with local guidance and no significant attitudinal change was found. Four other attitudes were aligned with local guidance at baseline and did not change during the study.Conclusions. Online information and face-to-face training can achieve a change in healthcare provider attitudes towards non-pharmacological treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. Further work is needed to assess whether attitudinal changes are maintained and translate into behavioural change.","PeriodicalId":119792,"journal":{"name":"Health Education in Practice: Journal of Research for Professional Learning","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education in Practice: Journal of Research for Professional Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33966/HEPJ.2.1.13209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background. Local chronic non-cancer pain guidance recommends that general practitioners should consider opioid deprescribing and referral to multidisciplinary healthcare providers for behaviourally based treatments. We designed a training package called AIMM (Assess, Inform, Manage and Monitor) to reinforce this stewardship.Aim. To identify whether participation in AIMM training effectively aligned clinicians’ attitudes with local guidance for treating chronic non-cancer pain.Design and setting. In 2014–15, the AIMM training was tested using a pre–post-test non-randomised design at two sites in NSW, Australia. The primary outcome measure was an 11-item, study-specific, pain attitude questionnaire (PAQ).Method. Step one of AIMM training involved online completion of the PAQ and review of a specialist pain website. Step two involved attendance at two face-to-face, two-hour interactive workshops led by pain experts who addressed opioid deprescribing and switching to broader care. A repeat PAQ survey was completed at the conclusion of the second workshop.Results. Nineteen participants attended the workshops, including general practitioners (n = 7), nurses (n = 5), exercise physiologists (n = 2), a dietitian (n = 1), community pharmacists (n = 2) and psychologists (n = 2). Significant shifts in six attitudes occurred, including prescribing less pain medication, greater emphasis on social reconnection, increasing planned activity and adopting anti-inflammatory nutrition (p < .05). Responses to the item regarding expectations of a positive recovery was not aligned with local guidance and no significant attitudinal change was found. Four other attitudes were aligned with local guidance at baseline and did not change during the study.Conclusions. Online information and face-to-face training can achieve a change in healthcare provider attitudes towards non-pharmacological treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. Further work is needed to assess whether attitudinal changes are maintained and translate into behavioural change.
基于当地指导培训初级保健提供者阿片类药物处方和慢性疼痛管理:态度改变的前后研究
背景。当地慢性非癌性疼痛指南建议全科医生应考虑开具阿片类药物处方,并转诊给多学科医疗保健提供者进行基于行为的治疗。我们设计了一个名为AIMM(评估、通知、管理和监控)的培训包来加强这种管理。确定参加AIMM培训是否有效地使临床医生的态度与当地治疗慢性非癌性疼痛的指导相一致。设计和设置。2014 - 2015年,在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的两个地点采用测试前-后非随机设计对AIMM培训进行了测试。主要结果测量是一份包含11个项目的疼痛态度问卷(PAQ)。AIMM培训的第一步包括在线完成PAQ和审查专家疼痛网站。第二步是参加两次面对面的、两小时的互动研讨会,由疼痛专家主持,讨论阿片类药物的处方和转向更广泛的治疗。第二次研修班结束时再次进行PAQ调查。19名参与者参加了研讨会,包括全科医生(n = 7)、护士(n = 5)、运动生理学家(n = 2)、营养师(n = 1)、社区药剂师(n = 2)和心理学家(n = 2)。六种态度发生了显著变化,包括减少止痛药的处方、更加强调社会重新联系、增加有计划的活动和采用抗炎营养(p < 0.05)。对积极复苏预期项目的回答与当地指导意见不一致,没有发现重大的态度变化。其他四种态度在基线时与当地指导一致,并且在研究期间没有改变。在线信息和面对面的培训可以改变医疗保健提供者对慢性非癌症疼痛的非药物治疗的态度。需要进一步的工作来评估态度的改变是否得到维持并转化为行为的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信