Africa on the Maps of Global Values: Comparative Analyses, Based on Recent World Values Survey Data

Arno Tausch
{"title":"Africa on the Maps of Global Values: Comparative Analyses, Based on Recent World Values Survey Data","authors":"Arno Tausch","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3214715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper attempts to close a gap in the recent literature on African economic development: the place of Africa on the maps of global economic, political and social values. We develop new comparable indices of global value development from the latest set of World Values Survey data and determine Africa’s place on a new factor analytical index of Global Civil Society. \n \nOur statistical calculations were performed by the routine and standard SPSS statistical program (SPSS XXIV), available at many academic research centers around the world and relied on the so-called oblique rotation of the factors, underlying the correlation matrix. The SPSS routine chosen in this context was the so-called promax rotation of factors, which in many ways must be considered to be the best suited rotation of factors in the context of our research. \n \nOur analysis of the World Values Survey data derived the following factor analytical scales, well compatible with a large social scientific literature: \n \n1. The non-violent and law-abiding society \n2. Democracy movement \n3. Climate of personal non-violence \n4. Trust in institutions \n5. Happiness, good health \n6. No redistributive religious fundamentalism \n7. Accepting the market \n8. Feminism \n9. Involvement in politics \n10. Optimism and engagement \n11. No welfare mentality, acceptancy of the Calvinist work ethics \n \nThe spread in the performance of African countries with complete data is really amazing. While we are especially hopeful about the development of future democracy in Ghana, our article suggests pessimistic tendencies for Egypt and Algeria, and especially for Africa’s leading economy, South Africa. High Human Inequality, as measured by the UNDP’s Human Development Report’s Index of Human Inequality, further impairs the development of Human Security. \n \nOne can maintain that the certain recent optimism, corresponding to economic and human rights data, emerging from Africa, is reflected also in our Index of the Development of Civil Society. There is at least some hope for Africa, on this front, too. \n  \n \nJEL Classification Numbers: C43, F5, Z12, D73 \n \nKeywords: C43 - Index Numbers and Aggregation; F5 - International Relations \nand International Political Economy; Z12 – Religion; D73 - Bureaucracy; \nAdministrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption","PeriodicalId":365899,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3214715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper attempts to close a gap in the recent literature on African economic development: the place of Africa on the maps of global economic, political and social values. We develop new comparable indices of global value development from the latest set of World Values Survey data and determine Africa’s place on a new factor analytical index of Global Civil Society. Our statistical calculations were performed by the routine and standard SPSS statistical program (SPSS XXIV), available at many academic research centers around the world and relied on the so-called oblique rotation of the factors, underlying the correlation matrix. The SPSS routine chosen in this context was the so-called promax rotation of factors, which in many ways must be considered to be the best suited rotation of factors in the context of our research. Our analysis of the World Values Survey data derived the following factor analytical scales, well compatible with a large social scientific literature: 1. The non-violent and law-abiding society 2. Democracy movement 3. Climate of personal non-violence 4. Trust in institutions 5. Happiness, good health 6. No redistributive religious fundamentalism 7. Accepting the market 8. Feminism 9. Involvement in politics 10. Optimism and engagement 11. No welfare mentality, acceptancy of the Calvinist work ethics The spread in the performance of African countries with complete data is really amazing. While we are especially hopeful about the development of future democracy in Ghana, our article suggests pessimistic tendencies for Egypt and Algeria, and especially for Africa’s leading economy, South Africa. High Human Inequality, as measured by the UNDP’s Human Development Report’s Index of Human Inequality, further impairs the development of Human Security. One can maintain that the certain recent optimism, corresponding to economic and human rights data, emerging from Africa, is reflected also in our Index of the Development of Civil Society. There is at least some hope for Africa, on this front, too.   JEL Classification Numbers: C43, F5, Z12, D73 Keywords: C43 - Index Numbers and Aggregation; F5 - International Relations and International Political Economy; Z12 – Religion; D73 - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
全球价值观地图上的非洲:基于最近世界价值观调查数据的比较分析
本文试图弥补最近关于非洲经济发展的文献中的一个空白:非洲在全球经济、政治和社会价值地图上的位置。我们根据最新的《世界价值观调查》数据制定了新的全球价值发展可比指数,并确定了非洲在全球公民社会新因素分析指数中的地位。我们的统计计算是通过常规和标准的SPSS统计程序(SPSS XXIV)进行的,该程序在世界各地的许多学术研究中心都可以使用,并依赖于所谓的因素的倾斜旋转,这是相关矩阵的基础。在这种情况下选择的SPSS例程是所谓的因子的最大旋转,这在许多方面必须被认为是我们研究背景下最适合的因子旋转。我们对世界价值观调查数据的分析得出了以下因素分析量表,与大量社会科学文献很好地兼容:非暴力和守法的社会。3.民主化运动个人非暴力的氛围。信任机构。快乐,身体健康。没有再分配的宗教原教旨主义。接受市场女权主义9。参与政治。乐观和投入。没有福利心态,接受加尔文主义的工作伦理。数据完整的非洲国家在表现上的传播真的很惊人。虽然我们对迦纳未来民主的发展特别有希望,但我们的文章指出,埃及和阿尔及利亚,尤其是非洲主要经济体南非,有悲观倾向。根据联合国开发计划署《人类发展报告》的人类不平等指数衡量,高度的人类不平等进一步损害了人类安全的发展。人们可以认为,最近非洲出现的与经济和人权数据相对应的某些乐观情绪也反映在我们的文明社会发展指数中。在这方面,非洲至少还有一些希望。JEL分类号:C43, F5, Z12, D73关键词:C43 -索引号及聚合;F5 -国际关系和国际政治经济学;Z12 -宗教;D73 -官僚主义;公共组织的行政程序;腐败
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信