A Copyright Limitations Treaty Based on the Marrakesh Model: Nightmare or Dream Come True?

Martin Senftleben
{"title":"A Copyright Limitations Treaty Based on the Marrakesh Model: Nightmare or Dream Come True?","authors":"Martin Senftleben","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3064823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the adoption of the Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons who are Blind, Visually Impaired, or Otherwise Print Disabled in 2013, the international copyright community has shown its willingness to take further steps in the harmonization of limitations and exceptions in the field of copyright. However, the Marrakesh Treaty is only the tip of the iceberg. Its preparation and negotiation took place against the background of a much broader debate over the introduction of so-called “ceilings” in international copyright law: binding rules that set a maximum level of permissible protection. While the Marrakesh Treaty entered into force on September 30, 2016, the bigger project of regulating the ceilings of copyright protection in an international instrument is still pending. \nHence, the question arises whether the results of the small step of adopting the Marrakesh Treaty are encouraging enough to take the giant leap of discussing ceilings of copyright protection and establishing a general Copyright Limitations Treaty. To answer this question, the following analysis will first shed light on the peculiar configuration of the Marrakesh Treaty. The Treaty combines both very specific and very open rules on L&Es for blind and print-disabled persons with the abstract criteria of the “three-step test” known from Article 9(2) BC, Article 13 TRIPS and Article 10 WCT. As a result of this treaty architecture, the objective of offering maximum legal certainty in respect of use privileges for blind, visually impaired and print-disabled persons is compromised. The Marrakesh Treaty can lead to a nightmare scenario in which neither the goal of legal certainty nor the advantage of flexibility is realized. However, the Marrakesh Treaty also demonstrates how international norms could be structured to arrive at a sufficiently flexible and sustainable treaty framework for the regulation of limitations and exceptions at the national level. Certain features of the Treaty can serve as a source of inspiration for the development of a dream scenario.","PeriodicalId":424117,"journal":{"name":"The Cambridge Handbook of Copyright Limitations and Exceptions","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cambridge Handbook of Copyright Limitations and Exceptions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3064823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the adoption of the Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons who are Blind, Visually Impaired, or Otherwise Print Disabled in 2013, the international copyright community has shown its willingness to take further steps in the harmonization of limitations and exceptions in the field of copyright. However, the Marrakesh Treaty is only the tip of the iceberg. Its preparation and negotiation took place against the background of a much broader debate over the introduction of so-called “ceilings” in international copyright law: binding rules that set a maximum level of permissible protection. While the Marrakesh Treaty entered into force on September 30, 2016, the bigger project of regulating the ceilings of copyright protection in an international instrument is still pending. Hence, the question arises whether the results of the small step of adopting the Marrakesh Treaty are encouraging enough to take the giant leap of discussing ceilings of copyright protection and establishing a general Copyright Limitations Treaty. To answer this question, the following analysis will first shed light on the peculiar configuration of the Marrakesh Treaty. The Treaty combines both very specific and very open rules on L&Es for blind and print-disabled persons with the abstract criteria of the “three-step test” known from Article 9(2) BC, Article 13 TRIPS and Article 10 WCT. As a result of this treaty architecture, the objective of offering maximum legal certainty in respect of use privileges for blind, visually impaired and print-disabled persons is compromised. The Marrakesh Treaty can lead to a nightmare scenario in which neither the goal of legal certainty nor the advantage of flexibility is realized. However, the Marrakesh Treaty also demonstrates how international norms could be structured to arrive at a sufficiently flexible and sustainable treaty framework for the regulation of limitations and exceptions at the national level. Certain features of the Treaty can serve as a source of inspiration for the development of a dream scenario.
基于马拉喀什模式的版权限制条约:噩梦还是美梦?
随着2013年通过《关于为盲人、视力障碍者或其他印刷品阅读障碍者获得已出版作品提供便利的马拉喀什条约》,国际版权界表明愿意采取进一步措施,协调版权领域的限制与例外。然而,《马拉喀什条约》只是冰山一角。它的准备和谈判是在更广泛的辩论背景下进行的,即在国际版权法中引入所谓的“上限”:设定允许保护的最高水平的具有约束力的规则。虽然《马拉喀什条约》已于2016年9月30日生效,但在一项国际文书中规范版权保护上限的更大项目仍悬而未决。因此,出现了这样一个问题:通过《马拉喀什条约》这一小步的结果是否足以令人鼓舞,从而可以迈出讨论版权保护上限和建立一项一般性的《版权限制条约》这一大步。为了回答这个问题,下面的分析将首先阐明《马拉喀什条约》的特殊结构。该条约结合了非常具体和非常开放的盲人和印刷品阅读障碍者的l&e规则,以及从《不列颠哥伦比亚省法典》第9(2)条、《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》第13条和《世界贸易公约》第10条所知的“三步检验”的抽象标准。由于这一条约架构,为盲人、视力障碍者和印刷品阅读障碍者的使用特权提供最大限度法律确定性的目标受到了损害。《马拉喀什条约》可能导致一种噩梦般的局面,既无法实现法律确定性的目标,也无法实现灵活性的优势。然而,《马拉喀什条约》也表明,如何构建国际规范,以形成一个足够灵活和可持续的条约框架,以便在国家一级管理限制和例外。《条约》的某些特点可以作为制定梦想情景的灵感来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信