ANALYSIS OF ROLLOVER RESTRAINT PERFORMANCE WITH AND WITHOUT SEAT BELT PRETENSIONER AT VEHICLE TRIP. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS

B. Hare, Lance Lewis, R. Hughes, Yoshiyuki Ishikawa, Kazuo Iwasaki, K. Tsukaguchi, Noriko Doi
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF ROLLOVER RESTRAINT PERFORMANCE WITH AND WITHOUT SEAT BELT PRETENSIONER AT VEHICLE TRIP. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS","authors":"B. Hare, Lance Lewis, R. Hughes, Yoshiyuki Ishikawa, Kazuo Iwasaki, K. Tsukaguchi, Noriko Doi","doi":"10.4271/2002-01-0941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, from a comprehensive text about occupant and vehicle responses in rollovers, the authors report on eight rollover research tests that were conducted using the 2001 Nissan Pathfinder with a modified FMVSS 208 dolly rollover test method. In this study, the driver and right front dummy restraint performance was analyzed. The rollover tests were initiated with the vehicle horizontal, not at a roll angle. After the vehicle translated laterally for a short distance, a trip mechanism was introduced to overturn the vehicle. The study analyzed retractor, buckle, and latch plate performance, as well as overall seat belt performance. National Automotive Sampling System (NASS) data was also analyzed to quantify the characteristics of real world rollovers and demonstrated the benefits of restraint use. The authors conclude that although the rollover test method yielded unrepeatable vehicle dynamics, the testing demonstrated proper restraint performance in all of the tests. In the tests with pretensioner activation, belt movement reduction compared to the non-pretensioner tests was only approximately 25 mm for the near side occupant and 50 mm for the far side occupant; this does not result in any measurable reduction in occupant injury.","PeriodicalId":291036,"journal":{"name":"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-0941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

In this chapter, from a comprehensive text about occupant and vehicle responses in rollovers, the authors report on eight rollover research tests that were conducted using the 2001 Nissan Pathfinder with a modified FMVSS 208 dolly rollover test method. In this study, the driver and right front dummy restraint performance was analyzed. The rollover tests were initiated with the vehicle horizontal, not at a roll angle. After the vehicle translated laterally for a short distance, a trip mechanism was introduced to overturn the vehicle. The study analyzed retractor, buckle, and latch plate performance, as well as overall seat belt performance. National Automotive Sampling System (NASS) data was also analyzed to quantify the characteristics of real world rollovers and demonstrated the benefits of restraint use. The authors conclude that although the rollover test method yielded unrepeatable vehicle dynamics, the testing demonstrated proper restraint performance in all of the tests. In the tests with pretensioner activation, belt movement reduction compared to the non-pretensioner tests was only approximately 25 mm for the near side occupant and 50 mm for the far side occupant; this does not result in any measurable reduction in occupant injury.
车辆行程时带和不带安全带预紧器的侧翻约束性能分析。在:乘员和车辆对侧翻的反应
在本章中,作者从一个关于乘员和车辆侧翻反应的综合文本中,报告了使用2001年日产探路者与改进的FMVSS 208小车侧翻试验方法进行的八次侧翻研究试验。在本研究中,分析了驾驶员和右前假人的约束性能。侧翻试验开始时车辆处于水平状态,而不是侧翻角度。在车辆横向平移一小段距离后,引入了一个跳闸机构来翻转车辆。该研究分析了牵引器、扣环和锁存板的性能,以及安全带的整体性能。还分析了国家汽车抽样系统(NASS)的数据,以量化真实世界的侧翻特征,并展示了约束使用的好处。作者得出结论,尽管侧翻试验方法产生了不可重复的车辆动力学,但在所有试验中都显示了适当的约束性能。在启动预紧器的测试中,与未启动预紧器的测试相比,近侧乘员的皮带移动减少量仅约为25毫米,远侧乘员的皮带移动量仅为50毫米;这不会导致任何可测量的乘员伤害减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信