Art School Building: The Old/New Chelsea.

Lucy Howarth
{"title":"Art School Building: The Old/New Chelsea.","authors":"Lucy Howarth","doi":"10.1111/J.1476-8070.2014.01767.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the wake of the recent demolition of the 1965 Chelsea School of Art building on Manresa Road in London, this article seeks to explore the relationship between art school architecture and art school pedagogy. Research on art school buildings, both national and international, and British art school education of the 1960s, is brought to bear, on the former ‘New School of Art in Chelsea’ building. In addition to an account of how this building came about, drawn from archival records and interviews with architects and former Chelsea students and staff, the correlation of utopianist values in post-war British society, modernist architecture and higher education in art is examined. The reports of the National Advisory Council on Art Education (NACAE), which, in the 1960s, ushered in fundamental changes to British art education, are touched upon, and an account of the building design developed between art educationalists (including Chelsea Principal Lawrence Gowing and Chairman of the NACAE William Coldstream) and architects of the London County Council, is given. Photographs of the building, in the 1960s and during its demolition in 2010, are included. In addition to a historical account and case-study, and despite the difficulties inherent, art school building is approached as an imaginative and socio-political gesture, as a utopian act; ‘art school building’ in both senses (‘building’ as a verb and as a noun).","PeriodicalId":296132,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Art and Design Education","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Art and Design Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1476-8070.2014.01767.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the wake of the recent demolition of the 1965 Chelsea School of Art building on Manresa Road in London, this article seeks to explore the relationship between art school architecture and art school pedagogy. Research on art school buildings, both national and international, and British art school education of the 1960s, is brought to bear, on the former ‘New School of Art in Chelsea’ building. In addition to an account of how this building came about, drawn from archival records and interviews with architects and former Chelsea students and staff, the correlation of utopianist values in post-war British society, modernist architecture and higher education in art is examined. The reports of the National Advisory Council on Art Education (NACAE), which, in the 1960s, ushered in fundamental changes to British art education, are touched upon, and an account of the building design developed between art educationalists (including Chelsea Principal Lawrence Gowing and Chairman of the NACAE William Coldstream) and architects of the London County Council, is given. Photographs of the building, in the 1960s and during its demolition in 2010, are included. In addition to a historical account and case-study, and despite the difficulties inherent, art school building is approached as an imaginative and socio-political gesture, as a utopian act; ‘art school building’ in both senses (‘building’ as a verb and as a noun).
艺术学校大楼:旧/新切尔西。
在伦敦Manresa路的1965年切尔西艺术学院大楼最近被拆除之后,本文试图探索艺术学校建筑和艺术学校教学法之间的关系。在原“切尔西新艺术学院”建筑上,对国内和国际艺术学校建筑以及20世纪60年代英国艺术学校教育进行了研究。除了从档案记录和对建筑师、前切尔西学生和员工的采访中描述这座建筑的形成过程之外,还研究了战后英国社会的乌托邦主义价值观、现代主义建筑和高等艺术教育之间的关系。国家艺术教育咨询委员会(NACAE)的报告在20世纪60年代引领了英国艺术教育的根本变革,并对艺术教育家(包括切尔西校长Lawrence Gowing和NACAE主席William Coldstream)和伦敦郡议会的建筑师之间发展的建筑设计进行了描述。该建筑在20世纪60年代和2010年拆除期间的照片也包括在内。除了历史叙述和案例研究之外,尽管存在固有的困难,艺术学校的建设被视为一种富有想象力的社会政治姿态,一种乌托邦行为;“艺术学校建筑”的两种含义(“建筑”作为动词和名词)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信