POSSIBILITY OF CONSTITUTION OF CIVILIZATION / CULTURE AS A COLLECTIVE SOCIО-HISTORICAL ACTOR

Ch. D. Koprivitsa
{"title":"POSSIBILITY OF CONSTITUTION OF CIVILIZATION / CULTURE AS A COLLECTIVE SOCIО-HISTORICAL ACTOR","authors":"Ch. D. Koprivitsa","doi":"10.18413/2408-932X-2019-5-1-0-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This article examines the possibility of constituting a civilization/culture as a collective socio-historical actor, primarily as an alternative between the conceptual extreme positions that we respectively call the realism and nominalism. It is important to find out whether the signifiers of “culture” and “civilization” can actually mark a real culture and civilization. Our principal question is examined within comparative consideration with the notion of the nation, and it is further tested against the question to display ability of practical, historical action. For this purpose, a number of different historical examples are considered, where civilization, in particular: European, could or could not appear as a collective actor. The result of the research is that due to their socio-psychological primacy, the national identifications have an advantage over wider and “more abstract” and remote – civilizational ones. Nevertheless, civilizational collective identification remains a permanent possibility of collective organization of social reality, when favorable historical conditions present.","PeriodicalId":434226,"journal":{"name":"RESEARH RESULT. SOCIAL STUDIES AND HUMANITIES","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RESEARH RESULT. SOCIAL STUDIES AND HUMANITIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-932X-2019-5-1-0-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. This article examines the possibility of constituting a civilization/culture as a collective socio-historical actor, primarily as an alternative between the conceptual extreme positions that we respectively call the realism and nominalism. It is important to find out whether the signifiers of “culture” and “civilization” can actually mark a real culture and civilization. Our principal question is examined within comparative consideration with the notion of the nation, and it is further tested against the question to display ability of practical, historical action. For this purpose, a number of different historical examples are considered, where civilization, in particular: European, could or could not appear as a collective actor. The result of the research is that due to their socio-psychological primacy, the national identifications have an advantage over wider and “more abstract” and remote – civilizational ones. Nevertheless, civilizational collective identification remains a permanent possibility of collective organization of social reality, when favorable historical conditions present.
文明/文化作为一个集体行动者构成的可能性sociО-historical
。本文考察了文明/文化作为集体社会历史行动者的可能性,主要是作为我们分别称之为现实主义和唯名主义的概念极端立场之间的一种选择。“文化”和“文明”的能指是否能真正标志一种真正的文化和文明,这一点很重要。我们的主要问题是在与民族的概念相比较的考虑中加以考察的,并在这个问题上进一步加以检验,以显示实际的、历史的行动能力。为此目的,考虑了许多不同的历史例子,其中文明,特别是欧洲文明,可能或不可能作为集体行动者出现。研究的结果是,由于其社会心理上的首要地位,国家认同比更广泛、“更抽象”和遥远的文明认同具有优势。然而,当有利的历史条件出现时,文明集体认同仍然是社会现实集体组织的永久可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信