REGULATION OF SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Balázs Bartóki-Gönczy
{"title":"REGULATION OF SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION","authors":"Balázs Bartóki-Gönczy","doi":"10.32575/ppb.2021.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media platforms are mainly characterised by private regulation. However, their direct and indirect impact on society has become such (fake news, hate  speech, incitement to terrorism, data protection breaches, impact on the viability of professional journalism) that private regulatory mechanisms in place (often opaque and not transparent) seem to be inadequate. In the present paper, I would  first address the problem of the legal classification of these services (media service provider vs. intermediary service provider), since the answer to this question is a  prerequisite for any state intervention. I would then present the regulatory  initiatives (with a critical approach) at the EU and national level which might shape the future of ‘social media platform’ regulation. ","PeriodicalId":127083,"journal":{"name":"Pro Publico Bono - Magyar Közigazgatás","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro Publico Bono - Magyar Közigazgatás","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32575/ppb.2021.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media platforms are mainly characterised by private regulation. However, their direct and indirect impact on society has become such (fake news, hate  speech, incitement to terrorism, data protection breaches, impact on the viability of professional journalism) that private regulatory mechanisms in place (often opaque and not transparent) seem to be inadequate. In the present paper, I would  first address the problem of the legal classification of these services (media service provider vs. intermediary service provider), since the answer to this question is a  prerequisite for any state intervention. I would then present the regulatory  initiatives (with a critical approach) at the EU and national level which might shape the future of ‘social media platform’ regulation. 
欧盟社会媒体平台的监管
社交媒体平台的主要特点是私人监管。然而,它们对社会的直接和间接影响(假新闻、仇恨言论、煽动恐怖主义、数据保护漏洞、对专业新闻业生存能力的影响)已经变得如此之大,以至于现有的私人监管机制(往往不透明和不透明)似乎不足。在本文中,我将首先解决这些服务的法律分类问题(媒体服务提供商与中介服务提供商),因为这个问题的答案是任何国家干预的先决条件。然后,我将在欧盟和国家层面提出监管倡议(以一种批判性的方法),这可能会塑造“社交媒体平台”监管的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信