Consumer Protection in Japanese Contract Law

M. Takizawa
{"title":"Consumer Protection in Japanese Contract Law","authors":"M. Takizawa","doi":"10.15057/17323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This short report presents a survey of consumer protection under Japanese contract law. In Japan, the Consumer Contract Act was enacted in 2000, but even before this, some acts provided special remedies for consumers. Therefore, it is appropriate to divide this report into two parts, namely, before and after the Consumer Contract Act. Before discussing Japanese contract law, Iʼd like to confirm the nature of the problem ̶ the necessity for consumer protection under contract law. In Japan, although I believe the situation is almost the same in Australia, between consumers and businesses, there are considerable gaps in the quality and quantity of information and in the negotiating power (Consumer Contract Act Article 1 points out this situation). Regarding the latter point (the gap in negotiating power), we must not forget the fact that most contracts between consumers and businesses are made by means of standard contracts, for which two problems can be identified. First, many consumers fail to read the contract before agreeing to it, and even if they do read it, it can be too complicated for the consumer to understand, as is the case with insurance policies. Second, the standards are prepared by the businesses before the negotiation begins, and it is practically impossible for the consumers to ask for an amendment of the terms, which means that those terms are not negotiated. For these reasons, there can be unfair terms in contracts between consumers and businesses, hence the need for special protection for consumers.","PeriodicalId":208983,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/17323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This short report presents a survey of consumer protection under Japanese contract law. In Japan, the Consumer Contract Act was enacted in 2000, but even before this, some acts provided special remedies for consumers. Therefore, it is appropriate to divide this report into two parts, namely, before and after the Consumer Contract Act. Before discussing Japanese contract law, Iʼd like to confirm the nature of the problem ̶ the necessity for consumer protection under contract law. In Japan, although I believe the situation is almost the same in Australia, between consumers and businesses, there are considerable gaps in the quality and quantity of information and in the negotiating power (Consumer Contract Act Article 1 points out this situation). Regarding the latter point (the gap in negotiating power), we must not forget the fact that most contracts between consumers and businesses are made by means of standard contracts, for which two problems can be identified. First, many consumers fail to read the contract before agreeing to it, and even if they do read it, it can be too complicated for the consumer to understand, as is the case with insurance policies. Second, the standards are prepared by the businesses before the negotiation begins, and it is practically impossible for the consumers to ask for an amendment of the terms, which means that those terms are not negotiated. For these reasons, there can be unfair terms in contracts between consumers and businesses, hence the need for special protection for consumers.
日本合同法中的消费者保护
这篇简短的报告介绍了日本合同法下消费者保护的调查。在日本,消费者合同法是在2000年制定的,但在此之前,一些法律为消费者提供了特殊的救济。因此,将本报告分为《消费者合同法》之前和之后两部分比较合适。在讨论日本合同法之前,我想先确认问题的性质——合同法对消费者保护的必要性。在日本,虽然我认为情况与澳大利亚差不多,但消费者和企业之间在信息的质量和数量以及谈判能力方面存在相当大的差距(《消费者合同法》第1条指出了这种情况)。关于后一点(谈判能力的差距),我们不能忘记这样一个事实,即消费者和企业之间的大多数合同都是通过标准合同签订的,这可以发现两个问题。首先,许多消费者在同意合同之前没有阅读合同,即使他们阅读了合同,合同也可能太复杂,消费者无法理解,就像保险单的情况一样。第二,标准是商家在谈判开始前就准备好的,消费者几乎不可能要求修改条款,这意味着这些条款没有谈判。由于这些原因,消费者和企业之间的合同可能存在不公平条款,因此需要对消费者进行特殊保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信