SOCRATIC DIALOGUE AS A LITERARY AND PHILOSOPHICAL PROTOFORM OF B. BRECHT’S DRAMATIC WORKS (BASED ON THE PLAY LIFE OF GALILEO)

N. Astrakhan
{"title":"SOCRATIC DIALOGUE AS A LITERARY AND PHILOSOPHICAL PROTOFORM OF B. BRECHT’S DRAMATIC WORKS (BASED ON THE PLAY LIFE OF GALILEO)","authors":"N. Astrakhan","doi":"10.35433/brecht.8.2022.16-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines Bertolt Brecht’s play Life of Galileo in the context of the tradition of Socratic dialogue as a derivative of carnivalized serious and laughter forms of antiquity. The philosophical and literary genre of Socratic dialogue is characterized by a focus on searching for truth, its comprehensive polyphonic discussion, the technique of provoking with a word, and checking the thinker’s truth with his life and death; all these features are revealed in Brecht’s epic drama. The artist's innovative dramaturgy is philosophical in nature, subordinated to the objective of giving thorough consideration to the main problem of the work, building a complex system of dialogical microcontexts, the correlation of which is supposed to highlight the possibilities of its solution to the fullest extent. The poetics of epic drama moving towards the \"dialectical theatre\" (Bertolt Brecht’s concept) is designed to transfer the intellectual and philosophical conflict embedded in the depicted events into the viewer’s consciousness. Influenced by the aesthetics of this poetics, the viewer is supposed to change their established views on the present and, therefore, their behavior in the contemporary world, which requires a person to take active actions based on understanding the truth hidden in the depths of historical reality. \nThe article pays special attention to the artistic concept of man, embodied in the image of Galileo, a scientist ahead of his time who comes into conflict with the conservative majority. An artistic interpretation of the central image, in particular, Brecht’s representation of its close connection with the Renaissance, alienates the play’s material from the author’s time and personality. However, paradoxically, this alienation actualizes the lyric and biographical principle laid down by the playwright in the image of the main character; it creates prerequisites for generalization, which makes it possible to emphasize the continuity of the tradition of a selfless search for truth and constant relevance of this tradition from the era of antiquity (Socrates and Plato) through the Renaissance (Giordano Bruno and Galileo Galilei) to the author’s present (Brecht and his contemporaries: artists and scientists with their behaviours in the situation of severe political pressure).","PeriodicalId":266292,"journal":{"name":"Brecht-Magazine: Articles, Essays, Translations","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brecht-Magazine: Articles, Essays, Translations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35433/brecht.8.2022.16-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines Bertolt Brecht’s play Life of Galileo in the context of the tradition of Socratic dialogue as a derivative of carnivalized serious and laughter forms of antiquity. The philosophical and literary genre of Socratic dialogue is characterized by a focus on searching for truth, its comprehensive polyphonic discussion, the technique of provoking with a word, and checking the thinker’s truth with his life and death; all these features are revealed in Brecht’s epic drama. The artist's innovative dramaturgy is philosophical in nature, subordinated to the objective of giving thorough consideration to the main problem of the work, building a complex system of dialogical microcontexts, the correlation of which is supposed to highlight the possibilities of its solution to the fullest extent. The poetics of epic drama moving towards the "dialectical theatre" (Bertolt Brecht’s concept) is designed to transfer the intellectual and philosophical conflict embedded in the depicted events into the viewer’s consciousness. Influenced by the aesthetics of this poetics, the viewer is supposed to change their established views on the present and, therefore, their behavior in the contemporary world, which requires a person to take active actions based on understanding the truth hidden in the depths of historical reality. The article pays special attention to the artistic concept of man, embodied in the image of Galileo, a scientist ahead of his time who comes into conflict with the conservative majority. An artistic interpretation of the central image, in particular, Brecht’s representation of its close connection with the Renaissance, alienates the play’s material from the author’s time and personality. However, paradoxically, this alienation actualizes the lyric and biographical principle laid down by the playwright in the image of the main character; it creates prerequisites for generalization, which makes it possible to emphasize the continuity of the tradition of a selfless search for truth and constant relevance of this tradition from the era of antiquity (Socrates and Plato) through the Renaissance (Giordano Bruno and Galileo Galilei) to the author’s present (Brecht and his contemporaries: artists and scientists with their behaviours in the situation of severe political pressure).
作为布莱希特戏剧作品的文学和哲学原型的苏格拉底对话(基于伽利略的戏剧生活)
本文将贝托尔特·布莱希特的戏剧《伽利略的一生》置于苏格拉底对话传统的背景下进行考察,认为苏格拉底对话是古代狂欢式严肃和笑声形式的衍生品。苏格拉底对话的哲学和文学体裁的特点是:注重真理的探索,全面的复调讨论,以一言一语挑拨的技巧,以生死来检验思想家的真理;所有这些特点都在布莱希特的史诗剧中得到了体现。艺术家的创新戏剧具有哲学性,从属于对作品主要问题的深入思考,构建一个复杂的对话微语境系统,这些对话微语境之间的关联应该最大程度地突出其解决的可能性。史诗戏剧的诗学走向“辩证剧场”(Bertolt Brecht的概念),旨在将所描绘事件中嵌入的智力和哲学冲突转移到观众的意识中。在这种诗学美学的影响下,观者应该改变自己对当下的既定看法,从而改变自己在当代世界中的行为,这就要求一个人在理解隐藏在历史现实深处的真理的基础上采取积极的行动。文章特别关注人的艺术观念,体现在伽利略的形象上,他是一个领先于他的时代的科学家,与保守的大多数人发生冲突。对中心形象的艺术诠释,特别是布莱希特对其与文艺复兴密切联系的表现,使戏剧的材料与作者的时代和个性疏远。然而,矛盾的是,这种异化在主人公的形象中实现了剧作家所设定的抒情和传记原则;它为概括创造了先决条件,这使得有可能强调从古代(苏格拉底和柏拉图)到文艺复兴(布鲁诺和伽利略),再到作者现在(布莱希特和他的同时代人:艺术家和科学家,他们在严重政治压力下的行为)的无私追求真理的传统的连续性和不断的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信