Perceptual comparison of neoglottal, oesophageal and normal speech.

Abstract

The sex, normality, intelligibility, rate, rhythm and intonation of 44 neoglottal, oesophageal and normal speakers have been judged by a panel of 10 trained listeners. It was found that the sex of the alaryngeal speakers was perceived correctly much less reliably than that of the normal speakers. Neoglottal speakers were rated more normal and intelligible than oesophageal speakers. The speaking rate of neoglottal speakers was judged not to be significantly different from that of normal speakers. Neoglottal speakers were considered more fluent and to have better intonation than the other alaryngeal speakers. Thus neoglottal speakers were found, on average, to be as good as or better than good oesophageal speakers in each of the respects of which judgements were made.