Constitutional Chaos in Bangladesh: A Journey from Secularism to Islamism

Md. Ferdows Hossen
{"title":"Constitutional Chaos in Bangladesh: A Journey from Secularism to Islamism","authors":"Md. Ferdows Hossen","doi":"10.55662/salrj.2022.801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every modern state stands on the separation of state and religion. Bangladesh was born as a secular state with a full guarantee of the right to freedom of religion. Though it started its journey proclaiming itself as a secular state, some political actors in the later course of history pushed the country into an almost Islamic Republic. This paper attempts to figure out what motivated the political actors to begin Islamizing the state by illustrating the chaos that arose from the constitutional modifications in question. It also argues that the basic structure doctrine and the principles of ‘Lemon Test’ turn the laws in Bangladesh, desecularizing the state, unconstitutional. It unearths the religiousness and secularity that our forefathers practiced in their daily lives long before Islam established itself on this land. It further finds the Constitutional Court of Bangladesh as the last resort to have those black laws declared unconstitutional, applying its supreme judicial review power within the current frameworks and limits of the constitution in reference to the landmark decisions of the American, Indian, and Turkish Constitutional Courts.","PeriodicalId":131737,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Law Review Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Law Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55662/salrj.2022.801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Every modern state stands on the separation of state and religion. Bangladesh was born as a secular state with a full guarantee of the right to freedom of religion. Though it started its journey proclaiming itself as a secular state, some political actors in the later course of history pushed the country into an almost Islamic Republic. This paper attempts to figure out what motivated the political actors to begin Islamizing the state by illustrating the chaos that arose from the constitutional modifications in question. It also argues that the basic structure doctrine and the principles of ‘Lemon Test’ turn the laws in Bangladesh, desecularizing the state, unconstitutional. It unearths the religiousness and secularity that our forefathers practiced in their daily lives long before Islam established itself on this land. It further finds the Constitutional Court of Bangladesh as the last resort to have those black laws declared unconstitutional, applying its supreme judicial review power within the current frameworks and limits of the constitution in reference to the landmark decisions of the American, Indian, and Turkish Constitutional Courts.
孟加拉的宪政混乱:从世俗主义到伊斯兰主义的旅程
每个现代国家都主张政教分离。孟加拉国作为一个世俗国家诞生,宗教自由权得到充分保障。虽然它开始宣称自己是一个世俗国家,但在后来的历史进程中,一些政治角色将该国推向了一个几乎是伊斯兰共和国的国家。本文试图通过阐释宪法修改引发的混乱,找出促使政治行为者开始将国家伊斯兰化的动机。它还认为,基本结构原则和“柠檬测试”原则使孟加拉国的法律,使国家非世俗化,违宪。它揭示了早在伊斯兰教在这片土地上建立之前,我们的祖先在日常生活中实践的宗教性和世俗性。委员会进一步认为,孟加拉国宪法法院是宣布这些黑人法律违宪的最后手段,它在现行宪法框架和限制内,参照美国、印度和土耳其宪法法院具有里程碑意义的裁决,行使其最高司法审查权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信