The Effect of Credit Constraints on Housing Prices: (Further) Evidence from a Survey Experiment

Tom Cusbert
{"title":"The Effect of Credit Constraints on Housing Prices: (Further) Evidence from a Survey Experiment","authors":"Tom Cusbert","doi":"10.47688/rdp2023-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The response of housing prices to financing conditions is determined by the effect on the marginal buyer, not the average household. I use heterogeneous willingness to pay (WTP) data from a stated preference experiment in Fuster and Zafar (2021) to estimate the effects of changes in mortgage rates and collateral constraints on housing prices by analysing the structure of housing demand curves. This work builds on their research, which focused on average changes in WTP. Relaxing down payment constraints has a large average effect on WTP, but the effect on price is less than half as large. Financially constrained households tend to respond more to relaxed constraints, but those households often have WTPs that are too low to affect market prices. Changing the mortgage rate has the same average effect on WTPs and on market prices, because there is no systematic relationship between a household's response to mortgage rates and their location on the demand curve. I use a heterogeneous user cost model of individual WTPs to understand how household heterogeneity determines the structure of overall housing demand. An empirical model using observable household characteristics allows the experimental findings to be applied to other household survey data to simulate the effects of credit conditions. The simulated effects of easing collateral constraints in Australia are fairly stable over the past 20 years, and show a similar pattern to the US results.","PeriodicalId":216440,"journal":{"name":"RBA Research Discussion Papers","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RBA Research Discussion Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47688/rdp2023-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The response of housing prices to financing conditions is determined by the effect on the marginal buyer, not the average household. I use heterogeneous willingness to pay (WTP) data from a stated preference experiment in Fuster and Zafar (2021) to estimate the effects of changes in mortgage rates and collateral constraints on housing prices by analysing the structure of housing demand curves. This work builds on their research, which focused on average changes in WTP. Relaxing down payment constraints has a large average effect on WTP, but the effect on price is less than half as large. Financially constrained households tend to respond more to relaxed constraints, but those households often have WTPs that are too low to affect market prices. Changing the mortgage rate has the same average effect on WTPs and on market prices, because there is no systematic relationship between a household's response to mortgage rates and their location on the demand curve. I use a heterogeneous user cost model of individual WTPs to understand how household heterogeneity determines the structure of overall housing demand. An empirical model using observable household characteristics allows the experimental findings to be applied to other household survey data to simulate the effects of credit conditions. The simulated effects of easing collateral constraints in Australia are fairly stable over the past 20 years, and show a similar pattern to the US results.
信贷约束对房价的影响:(进一步)来自调查实验的证据
住房价格对融资条件的反应取决于对边际购买者的影响,而不是对普通家庭的影响。我使用来自Fuster和Zafar(2021)的陈述偏好实验的异构支付意愿(WTP)数据,通过分析住房需求曲线的结构来估计抵押贷款利率和抵押品约束变化对房价的影响。这项工作建立在他们的研究基础上,他们的研究重点是WTP的平均变化。放宽首付限制对WTP的平均影响很大,但对价格的影响不到一半。财政拮据的家庭往往对宽松的限制作出更大的反应,但这些家庭的wtp往往太低,无法影响市场价格。改变抵押贷款利率对wtp和市场价格的平均影响是一样的,因为家庭对抵押贷款利率的反应与其在需求曲线上的位置之间没有系统的关系。我使用个体wtp的异质性用户成本模型来理解家庭异质性如何决定总体住房需求的结构。使用可观察到的家庭特征的经验模型允许将实验结果应用于其他家庭调查数据,以模拟信贷条件的影响。在过去20年里,澳大利亚放松抵押品限制的模拟效果相当稳定,并显示出与美国结果相似的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信