Policing and Racial (In)Justice in the Media: Newspaper Portrayals of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement

Civic Sociology Pub Date : 2020-03-23 DOI:10.1525/001c.12143
Janani Umamaheswar
{"title":"Policing and Racial (In)Justice in the Media: Newspaper Portrayals of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement","authors":"Janani Umamaheswar","doi":"10.1525/001c.12143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “Black Lives Matter” movement, centered on fighting racial injustice and inequality (particularly in the criminal justice system), has garnered a great deal of media attention in recent years. Given the relatively recent emergence of the movement, there exists very little scholarly research on media portrayals of the movement. In this article, I report findings from a qualitative examination of major newspaper portrayals of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement between April and August 2016, before the particularly divisive 2016 presidential election. Inductive textual analyses of 131 newspaper articles indicate that, although the movement’s goals were represented positively and from the perspective of members of the movement, the newspapers politicized and sensationalized the movement, and they focused far more on supposed negative consequences of the movement. I discuss these findings by drawing on the “protest paradigm” and the “public nuisance paradigm” in media coverage of social protest movements, arguing that the latter is particularly useful for interpreting portrayals of Black Lives Matter in the prevailing US political climate.","PeriodicalId":390930,"journal":{"name":"Civic Sociology","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civic Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/001c.12143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The “Black Lives Matter” movement, centered on fighting racial injustice and inequality (particularly in the criminal justice system), has garnered a great deal of media attention in recent years. Given the relatively recent emergence of the movement, there exists very little scholarly research on media portrayals of the movement. In this article, I report findings from a qualitative examination of major newspaper portrayals of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement between April and August 2016, before the particularly divisive 2016 presidential election. Inductive textual analyses of 131 newspaper articles indicate that, although the movement’s goals were represented positively and from the perspective of members of the movement, the newspapers politicized and sensationalized the movement, and they focused far more on supposed negative consequences of the movement. I discuss these findings by drawing on the “protest paradigm” and the “public nuisance paradigm” in media coverage of social protest movements, arguing that the latter is particularly useful for interpreting portrayals of Black Lives Matter in the prevailing US political climate.
媒体中的治安和种族正义:报纸对“黑人的命也重要”运动的描述
“黑人的命也重要”(Black Lives Matter)运动以反对种族不公正和不平等(特别是在刑事司法系统中)为中心,近年来获得了媒体的大量关注。鉴于该运动相对较晚才出现,关于该运动的媒体描述的学术研究很少。在这篇文章中,我报告了对2016年4月至8月期间主要报纸对“黑人的命也是命”(BLM)运动的描述进行定性检查的结果,这是在2016年特别分裂的总统大选之前。对131篇报纸文章的归纳文本分析表明,尽管从运动成员的角度积极地表达了运动的目标,但报纸将运动政治化和耸人听闻,他们更多地关注运动的所谓负面后果。我通过借鉴媒体对社会抗议运动的报道中的“抗议范式”和“公共滋扰范式”来讨论这些发现,认为后者对于解释当前美国政治气候下黑人生命也重要的描述特别有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信