“Should ‘Paraviwella Beach’ in Sri Lanka be Preserved for ‘Sea Bathing’?”: A ZTCM Approach

W. Rathnayake
{"title":"“Should ‘Paraviwella Beach’ in Sri Lanka be Preserved for ‘Sea Bathing’?”: A ZTCM Approach","authors":"W. Rathnayake","doi":"10.4038/SUSLJ.V14I2.7697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘Sea bathing’ is the main recreational activity at the Paraviwella Beach Park in Sri Lanka. However, there is a proposal by the Government of Sri Lanka to convert the Beach Park into an area that could be used for the expansion of the fisheries harbour. Our study examines the possibility of the proposal against maintaining the Park by using the Zonal Travel Cost Method to estimate the welfare benefits (in terms of Consumer Surplus). The study shows that the welfare benefits of Paraviwella Beach Park to be LKR 6.39 million per year for local visitors. Our results suggest that for maximum revenue from the park to be derived, the fresh water bathing fee should be raised to LKR 100.45 from the present fee of LKR 20 since those who sea-bathe requires a fresh water bath thereafter. Though it would reduce the visitor numbers to the Park by 34%, it would increase the total revenue of the Park by 231.18%. These values demonstrate that the Park can be preserved for sea-bathing while making the site more financially viable.","PeriodicalId":363402,"journal":{"name":"Sabaragamuwa University Journal","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sabaragamuwa University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/SUSLJ.V14I2.7697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

‘Sea bathing’ is the main recreational activity at the Paraviwella Beach Park in Sri Lanka. However, there is a proposal by the Government of Sri Lanka to convert the Beach Park into an area that could be used for the expansion of the fisheries harbour. Our study examines the possibility of the proposal against maintaining the Park by using the Zonal Travel Cost Method to estimate the welfare benefits (in terms of Consumer Surplus). The study shows that the welfare benefits of Paraviwella Beach Park to be LKR 6.39 million per year for local visitors. Our results suggest that for maximum revenue from the park to be derived, the fresh water bathing fee should be raised to LKR 100.45 from the present fee of LKR 20 since those who sea-bathe requires a fresh water bath thereafter. Though it would reduce the visitor numbers to the Park by 34%, it would increase the total revenue of the Park by 231.18%. These values demonstrate that the Park can be preserved for sea-bathing while making the site more financially viable.
斯里兰卡的“Paraviwella海滩”应该保留为“海浴”吗?: ZTCM方法
“海浴”是斯里兰卡Paraviwella海滩公园的主要娱乐活动。然而,斯里兰卡政府提出了一项建议,将海滩公园改为一个可用于扩大渔港的地区。本研究以区域旅行成本法(以消费者剩余计),探讨反对维持公园的建议的可能性。研究表明,Paraviwella海滩公园每年为当地游客带来的福利效益为639万卢比。我们的研究结果表明,为了从公园获得最大的收益,淡水洗浴费应该从目前的20卢比提高到100.45卢比,因为那些海浴者之后需要淡水洗浴。虽然这将使公园的游客人数减少34%,但会使公园的总收入增加231.18%。这些价值表明,公园既可以用于海浴,又可以使该地点在经济上更可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信