Detecting Deceptive Reviews Utilizing Review Group Model

Yuejun Li, Fangxin Wang, Shuwu Zhang, Xiaofei Niu
{"title":"Detecting Deceptive Reviews Utilizing Review Group Model","authors":"Yuejun Li, Fangxin Wang, Shuwu Zhang, Xiaofei Niu","doi":"10.4108/eai.29-6-2019.2282593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online product and store reviews play an important role in product and service recommendation for new customers. However, due to economic or fame reasons, dishonest people are employed to write fake reviews which is also called “opinion spamming” to promote or demote target products and services. Previous research has used text similarity, linguistics, rating patterns, graph relation and other behavior for spammer detection. It is difficult to find fake reviews by a glance of product reviews in time-descending order while It’s more easy to identify fraudulent reviews by checking the list of reviews of reviewers. We propose sieries of novel review grouping models to identify both positive and negative deceptive reviews. The review grouping algorithm can effectively split reviews of reviewer into groups which participate in building new model of review spamming detection. Several new features which are language independent based on group model are constructed. Additionally, we explore the collusion behavior between reviewers to build group collusion model. Experiments and evaluations show that the review group method and relevant models can effectivly improve the precision of 4%-7% in deceptive reviews detection task especially those posted by professional review spammers.","PeriodicalId":150308,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Mobile Multimedia Communications, Mobimedia 2019, 29th - 30th Jun 2019, Weihai, China","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Mobile Multimedia Communications, Mobimedia 2019, 29th - 30th Jun 2019, Weihai, China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.29-6-2019.2282593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online product and store reviews play an important role in product and service recommendation for new customers. However, due to economic or fame reasons, dishonest people are employed to write fake reviews which is also called “opinion spamming” to promote or demote target products and services. Previous research has used text similarity, linguistics, rating patterns, graph relation and other behavior for spammer detection. It is difficult to find fake reviews by a glance of product reviews in time-descending order while It’s more easy to identify fraudulent reviews by checking the list of reviews of reviewers. We propose sieries of novel review grouping models to identify both positive and negative deceptive reviews. The review grouping algorithm can effectively split reviews of reviewer into groups which participate in building new model of review spamming detection. Several new features which are language independent based on group model are constructed. Additionally, we explore the collusion behavior between reviewers to build group collusion model. Experiments and evaluations show that the review group method and relevant models can effectivly improve the precision of 4%-7% in deceptive reviews detection task especially those posted by professional review spammers.
利用评审组模型检测欺骗性评论
在线产品和商店评论在向新客户推荐产品和服务方面发挥着重要作用。然而,由于经济或名声的原因,不诚实的人被雇佣来写虚假评论,这也被称为“意见垃圾”,以促进或降低目标产品和服务。以前的研究已经使用文本相似度、语言学、评级模式、图关系和其他行为来检测垃圾邮件发送者。以时间递减的顺序浏览产品评论很难发现虚假评论,而通过查看评论者的评论列表更容易识别虚假评论。我们提出了一系列新的评论分组模型来识别正面和负面的欺骗性评论。评论分组算法可以有效地将评论者的评论分组,参与构建新的垃圾评论检测模型。在群模型的基础上,构造了几个与语言无关的特征。此外,我们还探讨了审稿人之间的合谋行为,建立了群体合谋模型。实验和评价表明,该方法和相关模型在欺骗性评论检测任务中,特别是专业垃圾评论发送者发布的欺骗性评论检测任务中,可以有效提高4%-7%的准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信