{"title":"Putting the Embodied Turn in Philosophy to Practice: Luce Irigaray’s Response to Nietzsche’s Philosophy of Embodied Thinking","authors":"Sigridur Thorgeirsdottir","doi":"10.1515/nietzstu-2021-2017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Luce Irigaray’s writings on Nietzsche’s philosophy belong to the groundbreaking interpretations of his work and they also confirm the continued relevance of his philosophy. Unlike most male-centric philosophers, Nietzsche not only saw that sexual difference was becoming one of the major philosophical issues of our age. He was also keenly aware of how it permeated our philosophical tradition with its dualistic models, which is one reason for Irigaray’s interest in it, as has been widely discussed in feminist/queer philosophical research into her Nietzsche interpretation. Another common denominator of Nietzsche and Irigaray are their philosophies of the body. Interpreters of Irigaray have pointed out how her conception of embodied, sexuate being calls for a new way of philosophical thinking (Grosz), and Stegmaier interprets the liberation from prejudices we encounter in Nietzsche’s works as a “liberation of philosophy.” How can the liberation of philosophy be understood in the way we practice philosophical thinking? In the following interpretation of Irigaray’s book The Marine Lover of Friedrich Nietzsche (1980), I show how it offers a theory and a practice of embodied philosophical thinking, which I will discuss in light of new phenomenological methodologies of embodied thinking (Gendlin, Petitmengin). Irigaray’s interpretation of Nietzsche’s philosophy in Marine Lover is both critical and constructive as apparent in her interpretation of Dionysus and Ariadne. On the one hand, this couple represents for her the patriarchal tradition of philosophy that she claims Nietzsche is still stuck in, and on the other hand, it also represents a liberation from resentment and misogyny in relations of the sexes. The notions of listening to oneself and to the other, being touched and tearing, enable such a liberation, both on the level of relations of the sexes and on the level of philosophical dialogues and thinking that Dionysus and Ariadne also represent. The water/ocean in the title of Marine Lover indicates how this is a philosophical text that displays an explicit processing and articulation of feelings, emotions, and affects in philosophical thinking.","PeriodicalId":356515,"journal":{"name":"Nietzsche-Studien","volume":"366 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nietzsche-Studien","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/nietzstu-2021-2017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Luce Irigaray’s writings on Nietzsche’s philosophy belong to the groundbreaking interpretations of his work and they also confirm the continued relevance of his philosophy. Unlike most male-centric philosophers, Nietzsche not only saw that sexual difference was becoming one of the major philosophical issues of our age. He was also keenly aware of how it permeated our philosophical tradition with its dualistic models, which is one reason for Irigaray’s interest in it, as has been widely discussed in feminist/queer philosophical research into her Nietzsche interpretation. Another common denominator of Nietzsche and Irigaray are their philosophies of the body. Interpreters of Irigaray have pointed out how her conception of embodied, sexuate being calls for a new way of philosophical thinking (Grosz), and Stegmaier interprets the liberation from prejudices we encounter in Nietzsche’s works as a “liberation of philosophy.” How can the liberation of philosophy be understood in the way we practice philosophical thinking? In the following interpretation of Irigaray’s book The Marine Lover of Friedrich Nietzsche (1980), I show how it offers a theory and a practice of embodied philosophical thinking, which I will discuss in light of new phenomenological methodologies of embodied thinking (Gendlin, Petitmengin). Irigaray’s interpretation of Nietzsche’s philosophy in Marine Lover is both critical and constructive as apparent in her interpretation of Dionysus and Ariadne. On the one hand, this couple represents for her the patriarchal tradition of philosophy that she claims Nietzsche is still stuck in, and on the other hand, it also represents a liberation from resentment and misogyny in relations of the sexes. The notions of listening to oneself and to the other, being touched and tearing, enable such a liberation, both on the level of relations of the sexes and on the level of philosophical dialogues and thinking that Dionysus and Ariadne also represent. The water/ocean in the title of Marine Lover indicates how this is a philosophical text that displays an explicit processing and articulation of feelings, emotions, and affects in philosophical thinking.
Luce Irigaray关于尼采哲学的著作是对尼采著作的开创性解读,同时也证实了尼采哲学的持续相关性。与大多数以男性为中心的哲学家不同,尼采不仅看到性别差异正在成为我们这个时代的主要哲学问题之一。他也敏锐地意识到它是如何渗透到我们哲学传统的二元模型中,这是Irigaray对它感兴趣的一个原因,因为女权主义者/酷儿哲学研究广泛讨论了她对尼采的解释。尼采和伊里加雷的另一个共同点是他们的身体哲学。伊里加雷的诠释者指出,她的具身性存在的概念如何要求一种新的哲学思维方式(格罗茨),而施特格迈尔将我们从尼采作品中遇到的偏见中解放出来解释为“哲学的解放”。如何以我们实践哲学思维的方式来理解哲学的解放?在下面对伊里加雷的书《弗里德里希·尼采的海洋情人》(1980)的解读中,我展示了它是如何提供了一种具身哲学思维的理论和实践,我将根据新的现象学方法来讨论具身思维(Gendlin, Petitmengin)。伊里加雷在《海上情人》中对尼采哲学的诠释既具有批判性又具有建设性,这在她对酒神和阿里阿德涅的诠释中很明显。一方面,这对夫妇对她来说代表了哲学的父权传统,她声称尼采仍然深陷其中,另一方面,这也代表了从性别关系中的怨恨和厌女症中解放出来。倾听自己和他人,被触摸和撕裂的概念,使这样一种解放成为可能,无论是在两性关系的层面上,还是在酒神和阿里阿德涅所代表的哲学对话和思考的层面上。《海洋情人》标题中的水/海洋表明,这是一篇哲学文本,在哲学思维中展示了对感情、情感和情感的明确处理和表达。