Smart defect classification for better analysis using tagging mechanisms

S. Meena, Uma M. Balasubramani
{"title":"Smart defect classification for better analysis using tagging mechanisms","authors":"S. Meena, Uma M. Balasubramani","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. Defect classification plays a major role in categorizing the defects based on components, sub components, different product areas etc. A well defined defects classification mechanism is a base for any type of defect analysis. Defects can be classified based on tags. These tags can be user-defined, shared or personal tags related to any area in a product. Tags can be used for searching the work items and viewing the tagged artifacts. Tags are very easy to create but yet very helpful in categorizing the defects for analysis. Tags are generally used for very specific, detailed defect analysis. During the product implementation, we have used this tagging mechanism extensively which helped us analyzing the defects for better product stability, better performance, focusing on specific areas that needs improvement in the product. We created filter for the tags and saved that view in the project dashboard for quick analysis. We also used the defect view to create a tag cloud which displays the number of work items by tag attribute. In this article, we would show how to use tags effectively and write query with tag attribute for filtering of defects in specific areas in a product. Upon analyzing these tags we found some interesting issues in the product. In this paper, we will show defect categorization using tag cloud in a dynamic way. We will also present how tag cloud provides details of the defect based on importance and number of occurrences. The defect analysis also highlighted some components which needed more attention.","PeriodicalId":332420,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":"365 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Summary form only given. Defect classification plays a major role in categorizing the defects based on components, sub components, different product areas etc. A well defined defects classification mechanism is a base for any type of defect analysis. Defects can be classified based on tags. These tags can be user-defined, shared or personal tags related to any area in a product. Tags can be used for searching the work items and viewing the tagged artifacts. Tags are very easy to create but yet very helpful in categorizing the defects for analysis. Tags are generally used for very specific, detailed defect analysis. During the product implementation, we have used this tagging mechanism extensively which helped us analyzing the defects for better product stability, better performance, focusing on specific areas that needs improvement in the product. We created filter for the tags and saved that view in the project dashboard for quick analysis. We also used the defect view to create a tag cloud which displays the number of work items by tag attribute. In this article, we would show how to use tags effectively and write query with tag attribute for filtering of defects in specific areas in a product. Upon analyzing these tags we found some interesting issues in the product. In this paper, we will show defect categorization using tag cloud in a dynamic way. We will also present how tag cloud provides details of the defect based on importance and number of occurrences. The defect analysis also highlighted some components which needed more attention.
使用标记机制进行更好的缺陷分类
只提供摘要形式。缺陷分类是基于组件、子组件、不同产品区域等对缺陷进行分类的主要方法。定义良好的缺陷分类机制是任何类型缺陷分析的基础。缺陷可以根据标签进行分类。这些标签可以是用户定义的、共享的或与产品中任何区域相关的个人标签。标记可用于搜索工作项和查看标记的工件。标签很容易创建,但是在对缺陷进行分类分析方面非常有帮助。标签通常用于非常具体、详细的缺陷分析。在产品实现过程中,我们广泛使用了这种标记机制,它帮助我们分析缺陷,以获得更好的产品稳定性,更好的性能,专注于产品中需要改进的特定领域。我们为标签创建了过滤器,并将该视图保存在项目仪表板中,以便快速分析。我们还使用缺陷视图来创建一个标记云,它通过标记属性显示工作项的数量。在本文中,我们将展示如何有效地使用标记,并编写带有标记属性的查询,以便在产品的特定区域中过滤缺陷。通过分析这些标签,我们发现了产品中一些有趣的问题。在本文中,我们将以一种动态的方式展示使用标签云对缺陷进行分类。我们还将介绍标记云如何根据出现的重要性和数量提供缺陷的详细信息。缺陷分析也突出了一些需要注意的部件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信