Reith, Russell, and the Robots: AI, Warfare, and Shaping the Debate

K. Scott
{"title":"Reith, Russell, and the Robots: AI, Warfare, and Shaping the Debate","authors":"K. Scott","doi":"10.34190/eccws.21.1.510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On December 8th, 2021, Professor Stuart Russell delivered the second of that year’s Reith Lectures, presented under the banner title ‘Living With Artificial Intelligence’. This specific talk dealt with ‘The Future Role of AI in Warfare’, and in this paper I propose a reading of Russell’s address which both summarises and critiques his argument and stance, to determine what, if anything, can be taken from his position as effectively a public philosopher and applied in the realm of modern warfare, where ethical questions are taken from the seminar room and enacted in battlespace. The Reith lectures occupy a unique place in public discourse; given each year by a leading figure in the field under discussion, they help to shape opinion and debate. In considering the role of AI, and in particular its deployment in combat, there is undoubtedly a need for multi- and transdisciplinary thought, but the choice of Russell as the lecturer is not unproblematic. He is undoubtedly an expert in the field of AI, but he has no direct experience of working with the military, and is clearly not a neutral witness. He has been a leading figure in the campaign to ban research into autonomous weapon systems, and was closely involved in the production of Slaughterbots, a short film which presents a nightmare vision of swarming drones as agents of political repression. There are deep and serious questions to be asked about the role of AI in warfare, but Russell’s position that we must stop all research in the field is arguably naïve. Our adversaries will surely not be as punctilious. At the heart of the debate lie complex issues concerning human agency and control (and ‘control’ lies at the etymological root of ‘cyber’); this paper will use Russell’s lecture as a starting point for the consideration of how we might develop an ethical doctrine for the use of AI, resting on the idea of human-machine teaming. It will, in short, argue for a cybernetic solution to the problems of cyber warfare.","PeriodicalId":258360,"journal":{"name":"European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security","volume":"325 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/eccws.21.1.510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On December 8th, 2021, Professor Stuart Russell delivered the second of that year’s Reith Lectures, presented under the banner title ‘Living With Artificial Intelligence’. This specific talk dealt with ‘The Future Role of AI in Warfare’, and in this paper I propose a reading of Russell’s address which both summarises and critiques his argument and stance, to determine what, if anything, can be taken from his position as effectively a public philosopher and applied in the realm of modern warfare, where ethical questions are taken from the seminar room and enacted in battlespace. The Reith lectures occupy a unique place in public discourse; given each year by a leading figure in the field under discussion, they help to shape opinion and debate. In considering the role of AI, and in particular its deployment in combat, there is undoubtedly a need for multi- and transdisciplinary thought, but the choice of Russell as the lecturer is not unproblematic. He is undoubtedly an expert in the field of AI, but he has no direct experience of working with the military, and is clearly not a neutral witness. He has been a leading figure in the campaign to ban research into autonomous weapon systems, and was closely involved in the production of Slaughterbots, a short film which presents a nightmare vision of swarming drones as agents of political repression. There are deep and serious questions to be asked about the role of AI in warfare, but Russell’s position that we must stop all research in the field is arguably naïve. Our adversaries will surely not be as punctilious. At the heart of the debate lie complex issues concerning human agency and control (and ‘control’ lies at the etymological root of ‘cyber’); this paper will use Russell’s lecture as a starting point for the consideration of how we might develop an ethical doctrine for the use of AI, resting on the idea of human-machine teaming. It will, in short, argue for a cybernetic solution to the problems of cyber warfare.
瑞思、罗素和机器人:人工智能、战争和塑造辩论
2021年12月8日,Stuart Russell教授发表了当年的第二场Reith讲座,主题是“与人工智能一起生活”。这个具体的演讲涉及“人工智能在战争中的未来角色”,在这篇论文中,我建议阅读罗素的演讲,总结和批评他的论点和立场,以确定什么,如果有的话,可以从他作为一个有效的公共哲学家的立场,并应用于现代战争领域,伦理问题是从研讨会的房间里拿走的,并在战场上实施。里思讲座在公共话语中占有独特的地位;每年由该领域的一位领军人物提出,有助于形成观点和辩论。考虑到人工智能的作用,特别是它在战斗中的部署,无疑需要多学科和跨学科的思考,但选择罗素作为讲师并非没有问题。他无疑是人工智能领域的专家,但他没有与军方合作的直接经验,显然不是一个中立的证人。他一直是禁止自主武器系统研究运动的领军人物,并密切参与了《杀戮机器人》(Slaughterbots)的制作,这部短片描绘了一幅噩梦般的景象:成群结队的无人机充当了政治镇压的代理人。关于人工智能在战争中的作用,存在深刻而严肃的问题,但罗素认为我们必须停止该领域的所有研究的立场可以说是naïve。我们的对手肯定不会这么谨小慎微。争论的核心是关于人类代理和控制的复杂问题(“控制”是“cyber”的词源);本文将以罗素的演讲为起点,考虑我们如何在人机合作的基础上,为人工智能的使用制定一套道德准则。简而言之,它将为网络战的问题提出一种控制论解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信