Probability Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plant Long-Term Temporary Shutdown State

Yanzhu Chen, Zhi Yang
{"title":"Probability Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plant Long-Term Temporary Shutdown State","authors":"Yanzhu Chen, Zhi Yang","doi":"10.1115/icone29-91782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In recent years, due to the influence of power grid demand and other factors, some nuclear power plants have long-term temporary SHUTDOWN. At present, there is no mature quantitative analysis method to measure which Plant operational state is safer under long-term temporary shutdown. Taking a second-generation nuclear power plant as an example, this paper first briefly introduces the PSA analysis method; Secondly, the difference is analyzed qualitatively, which between standard long-term temporary shutdown condition and refueling shutdown condition. Thirdly, from the quantitative point of view, the model processing methods and analysis assumptions are introduced, the risk views are given, and the quantitative calculation and sensitivity analysis are carried out; Finally, the analysis conclusion is obtained.\n Stay in the standard long-term temporary shutdown state for 15/30/45/60 days, after supplementing the calculation of the thermal shutdown condition,the risk per unit time of long-term temporary staying Maintenance Cold Shutdown mode is lower. The risk sequence is: Cooldown with the residual Heat Removal mode > Hot shutdown condition > Maintenance Cold Shutdown mode with closed primary loop. From the perspective of the risk of core damage, it is suggested that the Maintenance cold shut mode in which the primary loop is kept closed is recommended for long-term temporary shutdown of the power plant.","PeriodicalId":407628,"journal":{"name":"Volume 13: Risk Assessments and Management","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 13: Risk Assessments and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/icone29-91782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, due to the influence of power grid demand and other factors, some nuclear power plants have long-term temporary SHUTDOWN. At present, there is no mature quantitative analysis method to measure which Plant operational state is safer under long-term temporary shutdown. Taking a second-generation nuclear power plant as an example, this paper first briefly introduces the PSA analysis method; Secondly, the difference is analyzed qualitatively, which between standard long-term temporary shutdown condition and refueling shutdown condition. Thirdly, from the quantitative point of view, the model processing methods and analysis assumptions are introduced, the risk views are given, and the quantitative calculation and sensitivity analysis are carried out; Finally, the analysis conclusion is obtained. Stay in the standard long-term temporary shutdown state for 15/30/45/60 days, after supplementing the calculation of the thermal shutdown condition,the risk per unit time of long-term temporary staying Maintenance Cold Shutdown mode is lower. The risk sequence is: Cooldown with the residual Heat Removal mode > Hot shutdown condition > Maintenance Cold Shutdown mode with closed primary loop. From the perspective of the risk of core damage, it is suggested that the Maintenance cold shut mode in which the primary loop is kept closed is recommended for long-term temporary shutdown of the power plant.
核电厂长期临时停堆状态的概率安全分析
近年来,由于电网需求等因素的影响,部分核电站长期临时停运。目前还没有成熟的定量分析方法来衡量电站在长期临时停堆情况下哪种运行状态更安全。本文以某二代核电站为例,首先简要介绍了PSA分析法;其次,定性分析了标准长期临时停堆工况与换料停堆工况的差异。第三,从定量的角度,介绍了模型处理方法和分析假设,给出了风险观点,并进行了定量计算和敏感性分析;最后,得出分析结论。在标准长期暂停状态下停留15/30/45/60天,补充热停工况计算后,长期暂停维护冷停模式单位时间的风险更低。风险顺序为:带余热排出模式的冷却>热停机状态>带主回路闭合的维护冷停机模式。从堆芯损坏风险的角度考虑,建议电站长期临时停堆采用一次回路保持关闭的维护冷停堆方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信